Disclaimer: This is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way, shape, or form encourage use nor condone the use of any illegal substances or the use of legal substances in an illegal manner. The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes and shall not take the place of qualified medical advice and should not be construed as an endorsement or recommendation for any illegal activity.
about the waist difference.. yes Phil has a tighter and smaller waist, but lets get real, Ronnie has 50 more pounds of muscle to hold up.. the waist is just like any other muscle, it grows to adapt to the rest of the body, we have seen pics with Ronnie and a tight/small weight, but he was also a hell of a lot smaller.. one must sacrifice a bit of size in the waist in order to attain more muscle on his frame, its just that simple.. plus a small waist on a guy Ronnie's size wouldn't look right anyways.
I meant for thier frames, i think they both have a lot of mass, ronnie ya had over the top mass but Phil i think holds his muscle, he doesnt look freakishly huge and looks like how a bb should look (to me). Like Ruhl he had a crap load of mass, great bb but to me wasnt the classic bb like the old timers that i like. Ronnie looked freakish (in a good way) but to me Heath looks like the classic bb but the new generation. I guess im blind but the pics the only thing I see ronnie totally owning on is back lat spread the rest i think is phil, look at mass vs definition, phil has both. this is my opinion so :jerkoff1: thats what i think