Dennis Wolf 2007 vs 2010 [New York Pro]

• May 9, 2010

• #1

tkD

Administrator

Staff

VIP

Member

Joined

Mar 7, 2008

Messages

21,168

Points

113

3rd in both shows, but where did he looked better? Did he improved? What's your input on this?


Pics used:
Dennis Wolf - 2007 NY Pro
Dennis Wolf - 2010 NY Pro



Routines '07 vs '10:

 

• May 9, 2010

• Thread starter
• #2

tkD

Administrator

Staff

VIP

Member

Joined

Mar 7, 2008

Messages

21,168

Points

113

 

• May 9, 2010

• Thread starter
• #3

tkD

Administrator

Staff

VIP

Member

Joined

Mar 7, 2008

Messages

21,168

Points

113

^^ still '07 vs '10, but the last pics on the far right are from RXM, 2010 NY Pro.








btw the 3rd option on the poll is for the lulz, don't take it serious, lol.

 

• May 9, 2010

• #4

The King Of Lurkers

Mecca V.I.P.

VIP

Joined

Jul 4, 2009

Messages

8,975

Points

113

I will have to say 2007 looks better no question about that

 

• May 9, 2010

• #5

Natzo

Elvira turns me on

VIP

Joined

Aug 2, 2008

Messages

10,726

Points

48

07 for sure. better condition better colour.

not much mass added if any at all. only his lower back has slightly improved.

 

• May 9, 2010

• #6

Lanois

Mecca V.I.P.

VIP

Joined

Sep 30, 2006

Messages

510

Points

16

the only pose he improved in would be the front double bi, and his colour is awful in 2010

 

• May 9, 2010

• #7

Flex

Mecca V.I.P.

VIP

Joined

Jul 12, 2006

Messages

6,296

Points

38

Anyone else notice how much bigger his waist got?

Overall, 2010 is better due to his added thickness. Although his waist, color, and conditioning was better in 2007.

 

• May 9, 2010

• #8

FEVER

Mecca V.I.P.

VIP

Joined

Sep 16, 2009

Messages

853

Points

18

it is not a good comparison. Wolf is bigger in the pictures to the right based on pixels. It looks as he is closer to the camera and therefor it will seem that he is bigger

 

• May 9, 2010

• Thread starter
• #9

tkD

Administrator

Staff

VIP

Member

Joined

Mar 7, 2008

Messages

21,168

Points

113

FEVER said:

it is not a good comparison. Wolf is bigger in the pictures to the right based on pixels. It looks as he is closer to the camera and therefor it will seem that he is bigger

Click to expand...

Angles are a bitch, man..

 

• May 9, 2010

• #10

M

mvsf1

Mecca V.I.P.

VIP

Joined

Jul 15, 2006

Messages

6,430

Points

38

tkD, you proved me wrong. In fact, his lower back looked slightly better in 2007.

So, Dennis'07 takes it.

 

MuscleMecca Crew

Mecca Staff

• May 9, 2010

• #11

Salt

Well-known member

Member

Joined

Feb 20, 2008

Messages

120

Points

18

His calfs has disappeared. He really needs to work on the whole lower body.

 

• May 10, 2010

• #12

nigster

Mecca V.I.P.

VIP

Joined

Oct 2, 2006

Messages

2,605

Points

38

He had small calves. Now, he doesn't have calves. Chest is improved and so are hams and glutes (he still needs bigger hams and glutes). But his waist looks worse and his conditioning isn't right there.

 

• May 10, 2010

• #13

Y

yardharr

Active member

Member

Joined

Sep 19, 2009

Messages

31

Points

6

It looks like he lost some lat thickness since 07. He also doesn't have the front delt/chest separation like he did in 07, and as previously mentioned his calves are noticeably smaller. And the waist seems a little bigger, a shame since it is what made him stand out amongst all the huge guts in 07.
On the other hand, hams are thicker, especially the upper hams.

What does Dennis need to do to be top competition at the olympia again?

I think we can all agree with more DEADLIFT= ham/glute/lower back. His quads are massive and have an unusual shape, so he really needs to put the rest of his lower body into proportion. Deadlifts would also help his lat thickness. Some would say that increasing the lat length would ruin his incredible V-taper, but I think it would accentuate it; I think wine-glass instead of V-taper when I see Dennis.
And calves, I know he has poor genetics but if his calves are decreasing instead of increasing there is obviously a problem as well as a potential to develop them.

 

• May 10, 2010

• Thread starter
• #14

tkD

Administrator

Staff

VIP

Member

Joined

Mar 7, 2008

Messages

21,168

Points

113

Salt said:

His calfs has disappeared.

Click to expand...

^^this. Looks like his left calf atrophied? compared to 2007, they are almost nonexistent.

 

• May 11, 2010

• #15

Beau

Mecca V.I.P.

VIP

Joined

Apr 9, 2007

Messages

2,664

Points

36

His back looks better in 07 than in 2010 IMO...he hasn't improved at all if anything he has gotten worse

 

• May 11, 2010

• #16

MrChewiebitums

Mecca V.I.P.

VIP

Joined

Dec 27, 2008

Messages

1,946

Points

38

has anyone mentioned the lights and tan?
They are both worse in the 2010 pics

 

• Jun 11, 2010

• #17

HeavyWeight_86

Well-known member

Member

Joined

Jan 21, 2009

Messages

470

Points

18

The man will go down as one of the most wasted genetic potential if he keeps getting this worst

 

• Dec 20, 2010

• #18

J

joligr

Well-known member

Member

Joined

Feb 27, 2008

Messages

114

Points

16

Amazing the limitations of the genetics, almost no improvements, it surprises me considering how young he still is and even more because surely he has been taken roids and all that stuff during ?3 long years?

 

Last edited: Dec 20, 2010