S
SteveTo
Member
Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2020
- Messages
- 7
- Points
- 1
Is hgh or anabolics better for growth?
Taking HGH without stacking it with testosterone is useless. It will not grow muscle the way people think on its own. And it is expensive as hell; any kit under $1,000 for a month's supply is shit. And any other form (gel, spray, patches, etc.) are phony. The body can only aromatize growth via injection.
Taking HGH without stacking it with testosterone is useless. It will not grow muscle the way people think on its own. And it is expensive as hell; any kit under $1,000 for a month's supply is shit. And any other form (gel, spray, patches, etc.) are phony. The body can only aromatize growth via injection.
Taking HGH without stacking it with testosterone is useless. It will not grow muscle the way people think on its own. And it is expensive as hell; any kit under $1,000 for a month's supply is shit. And any other form (gel, spray, patches, etc.) are phony. The body can only aromatize growth via injection.
Taking HGH without stacking it with testosterone is useless. It will not grow muscle the way people think on its own. And it is expensive as hell; any kit under $1,000 for a month's supply is shit. And any other form (gel, spray, patches, etc.) are phony. The body can only aromatize growth via injection.
I agree with you mostly. But Ive taken 2 different brands of generic growth off cycle and it helped. It was definitely better than lifting straight natty. Is it worth the money? IDK, but generic isn't that expensive so for me it was. I agree that I would NEVER run human grade GH without running a decent amount of test. Human grade GH is just way to expensive to not use it correctly.
Taking HGH without stacking it with testosterone is useless. It will not grow muscle the way people think on its own. And it is expensive as hell; any kit under $1,000 for a month's supply is shit. And any other form (gel, spray, patches, etc.) are phony. The body can only aromatize growth via injection.
I agree with you mostly. But Ive taken 2 different brands of generic growth off cycle and it helped. It was definitely better than lifting straight natty. Is it worth the money? IDK, but generic isn't that expensive so for me it was. I agree that I would NEVER run human grade GH without running a decent amount of test. Human grade GH is just way to expensive to not use it correctly.
Taking HGH without stacking it with testosterone is useless. It will not grow muscle the way people think on its own. And it is expensive as hell; any kit under $1,000 for a month's supply is shit. And any other form (gel, spray, patches, etc.) are phony. The body can only aromatize growth via injection.
I agree with you mostly. But Ive taken 2 different brands of generic growth off cycle and it helped. It was definitely better than lifting straight natty. Is it worth the money? IDK, but generic isn't that expensive so for me it was. I agree that I would NEVER run human grade GH without running a decent amount of test. Human grade GH is just way to expensive to not use it correctly.
Exactly. Any time you see GH from China that sounds too good to be true, pace-wise, it is.
- - - Updated - - -
Taking HGH without stacking it with testosterone is useless. It will not grow muscle the way people think on its own. And it is expensive as hell; any kit under $1,000 for a month's supply is shit. And any other form (gel, spray, patches, etc.) are phony. The body can only aromatize growth via injection.
I agree with you mostly. But Ive taken 2 different brands of generic growth off cycle and it helped. It was definitely better than lifting straight natty. Is it worth the money? IDK, but generic isn't that expensive so for me it was. I agree that I would NEVER run human grade GH without running a decent amount of test. Human grade GH is just way to expensive to not use it correctly.
Exactly. Any time you see GH from China that sounds too good to be true, pace-wise, it is.