^And this comes as a surprise why?
Yeah he's an Aussie, he wrote He Died With A Felafel In His Hand which you may recall as either book or film.
He's in the last few years began to write alt-history type novels, starting with his World War 2.1 trilogy (whereby a naval force from a few decades in our future is transported back in time to the Battle of Midway which causes immense repercussions for the war and changes the past as we know it). He does a good job of both action and intrigue and really fleshes out his main characters. Also I really enjoy his references to pop-culture sprinkled throughout his books and his adaptation of real-life people as characters in his last trilogy (Prince Harry, Einstein, J Edgar Hoover, Truman where all main characters in WW2.1). I'd be hard-pressed to give him a specific genre other than alt-history as he mixes war, action, political intrigues and the like together.
I read in an interview that WW2.1 stemmed from a conversation where he and a friend where trying to think up the dumbest plots for a book that they could. Then he wrote 3 novels with it.
^^ Hmmm sounds half interesting. I'm usually not a fan of those sorts of techno-thrillers because they spend more time on exposition than they do on story and character. Tom Clancy is a classic for this, so much detail about crap that no-one cares about. Call it a bomb and have Jack Ryan stop it from being used for crying out loud! I don't need to hear about its manufacturing date and how the satelite relays can be duped to belive it is one of ours....
A few books:
Galileo's Dream, Kim Stanley Robinson.
Good stuff, but no where near his previous work like Red Mars or Antarctica.
Deep Down Things, The Breathtaking Beauty of Particle Physics Bruce Schumm
VERY, very good. If you're like me and want to have a good idea what the Standard Model looks like but lack the depth in mathematics to read something like Roger Penrose's books, this is for you. If manages to give a deal with physics in a non-superficial way without giving up much.
Finished Lee Child's 61 Hours the other night. I'm really annoyed. The new book doesn't come out for another 2 months!!!
If you haven't read this one yet, take my advice and read it once the new one comes out in late September. That way the cliffhanger will be more quickly resolved for you.
Going to start Exit Music by Ian Rankin (the final Rebus mystery) tonight. Hoping it is decent.
Also I found out that my friend's publishing company has been rolling out a few more books of late. He had just established it when I first met him, but it was always a part time thing. Now he and his wife seem to have more time to get books out. Check it out: http://ticonderogapublications.com/
I'm currently reading Darwin's Origin of Species as a follow-up to Dawkins' The God Delusion. Let's say that the former's prose isn't as inspirited as the latter's. After that, I may go back to Dawkins and read some of his prior work, or I could check out Hawking's A Brief History of Time. Then again, that Deep Down Things looks like a fine read as well.
That's great! I'm a HUGE fan of Dawkins, I've read just about everything he's written, and even met him a couple times. If you like The God Delusion, I would recommend The Devil's Chaplin. It's a nice, easy read, a collection of his essays mostly dealing with psuedo-science and the like. On the other hand, if you want to read his best work on biology, nothing beats The Selfish Gene.Quote
Btw, I'm impressed that you're reading Darwin's original work. For all my love of biology, I never got around to reading it, and I'm probably worse off because of it. Any particular edition you're reading? If you recommend it, I'll probably go pick it up.
Originally Posted by Line
I've only read some snippets of Dawkins. My main problem is the hipocrisy displayed by the way he rails against things. I do agree that someone like him standing up and taking the fight back is needed, but it ultimately undermines his own position.
On Darwin; his work was interesting, but both flawed and hard to read (old deliberately elitist language use). His original work would have been strengthened if his collegues had been allowed to be co-authors and added their collarborative conclusions. Darwin was, in a sense, too confined by religion to publish the best theory. This was obviously then brought out by his collegues and those he influenced as the theory became accepted fact. But we still have the fundamentalists picking holes in the theory because of his less than decisive conclusions (which is pointless considering the 140yrs of research that has followed and confirmed his work).
I wouldn't go so far as to call him a hypocrite. He rails against unsubstantiated beliefs yet his opponents rarely (if ever) take the time examine the evidence he presents. I've seen him in action against some Creationists, and he gave them a fair chance to defend their ideas. I can understand his angst.Quote
That being said, he can be annoying as hell at times. I recently saw an interview he did on Youtube and he definitely came off as snooty. Arrogant, yes. Hypocrite? Perhaps not.
The Children of H?rin
Since I'm a huge fan of the LOTR movie triology I've decided to read the whole work of Tolkien.
New MOTM October 2009
My lifting videos