• musclemecca bodybuilding forums does not sell or endorse any bodybuilding gear, products or supplements.
    Musclemecca has no affiliation with advertisers; they simply purchase advertising space here. If you have questions go to their site and ask them directly.
    Advertisers are responsible for the content in their forums.
    DO NOT SELL ILLEGAL PRODUCTS ON OUR FORUM

Obama to target excessive financial risk-taking

Oloz

Oloz

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
505
Points
16
source: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60K0RW20100121

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama, reeling from an election defeat in the Senate, will propose stricter limits on financial risk-taking on Thursday in a move that may recall Depression-era curbs on banks.

The president will announce a series of measures to cut down on excessive risk-taking as part of a revamp of the country's financial regulatory system, a senior Obama official said on Wednesday.

The move could also help the White House tap into public rage over Wall Street excess after Obama's Democratic Party was rebuffed by voters in Massachusetts, who elected Republican Scott Brown to the U.S. senate.

"The proposal will include size and complexity limits specifically on proprietary trading and the White House will work closely with the House and Senate to work this into legislation," the official said.

Proprietary trading refers to a firm making bets on financial markets with its own money, rather than executing a trade for a client.

The White House has blamed the practice for reckless gambling on the U.S. property market which resulted in massive losses that almost destroyed the financial system in 2008.

This forced taxpayers to provide a $700 billion bank bailout to prevent the most severe U.S. recession since the 1930s from getting even worse.

REINSTATING 1930S LIMITS

The Obama official did not provide details of the plan, which would require congressional approval. But U.S. lawmakers are already reviewing measures that, in some cases, recall the scope of financial reform enacted after the Great Depression.

Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley told Reuters earlier this week that there should be a firewall to separate risky trading activities and normal bank-lending.

A more aggressive proposal was put forth last month by former Republican presidential nominee John McCain and Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell. Their measure would reinstate the 1930s-era Glass-Steagall limits on banking by barring large banks from affiliating with securities firms and being in the insurance business.

Passage of the Cantwell-McCain bill would force firms at the center of last year's financial crisis -- such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo -- to rethink their banking, investment and insurance operations.

Obama will speak at 11:40 a.m. EST following a meeting with Paul Volcker, the former Federal Reserve chairman who heads his economic recovery advisory board and who favors curbing big financial firms to limit their ability to do harm.

Obama separately told ABC News in an interview that the surprise defeat of his Democratic Party candidate in Massachusetts on Tuesday reflected anger over bankers' bailouts and double-digit unemployment.

Obama has already unveiled a plan to tax banks up to $117 billion over the next 10 years to recoup money taxpayers lost in the bank bailout conceived by his predecessor, former President George W. Bush, to stem the financial crisis.

Obama is picking on a popular enemy. Ordinary Americans, facing 10 percent unemployment as the economy recovers from the recession inflicted by the financial market collapse, have been enraged by reports of multimillion-dollar banker bonuses.

Goldman Sachs is expected to report strong earnings on Thursday. Critics argue that such large profits -- and similarly large bonus payouts -- are only possible because of public support of financial institutions."
 
R

Ryeland

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
491
Points
16
Some of these regulations, such as banks staying out of insurance are similar to what currently exists in Canada.

However there is the question of will what worked in the 30's work now, and is further regulation helpful.
 
Ironslave

Ironslave

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
4,608
Points
38
potkettle-1.gif
 
pegasus

pegasus

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
487
Points
18
Some of these regulations, such as banks staying out of insurance are similar to what currently exists in Canada.

However there is the question of will what worked in the 30's work now, and is further regulation helpful.

Its obvious that it won't. Prop trading had nothing to do with the collapse, and isn't it ironic that AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac won't be effected by any of this clowns new proposals.
 
Justwonderin

Justwonderin

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Messages
87
Points
6
I'm not political, I did take economics for a semester in high school 8 years ago so im pretty much an expert and obama is a retard for real yo - free market all the way baby
 
Big04pimpin

Big04pimpin

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
1,742
Points
38
I'm not political, I did take economics for a semester in high school 8 years ago so im pretty much an expert and obama is a retard for real yo - free market all the way baby

lol. thats awesome.


I have to throw my $.02 in and say, why the hell does the US government always step in? We always make things worse. We should just let the market play out.
 
Justwonderin

Justwonderin

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Messages
87
Points
6
why the hell does the US government always step in?

yeah i was half kidding. im not an expert but I could not make an argument he couldn't counter for free market being the way to go. personally im a big fan of fight club...i think we should do away w/ it all and live like wild ass cave men.

like w/ them trying to save Ford and Chevy and all that. If they had a successful business model and adapted to changing needs and technologies they wouldn't have needed a bail out. Honda, toyota didnt need one. thats about not letting a Chinese company take over a market we could have dominated here by american companies. they deserve to go under b/c they suck.
and dont get me started on the financial institutes. The market has to be allowed to correct itself in order to learn from its mistakes. I work for Bank of America in the mortgage side of the business and i already see them starting to make some of the same mistakes they were before we had the meltdown b/c we have government money to back us up. its dumb but w/e
 
Big04pimpin

Big04pimpin

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
1,742
Points
38
yeah i was half kidding. im not an expert but I could not make an argument he couldn't counter for free market being the way to go. personally im a big fan of fight club...i think we should do away w/ it all and live like wild ass cave men.

like w/ them trying to save Ford and Chevy and all that. If they had a successful business model and adapted to changing needs and technologies they wouldn't have needed a bail out. Honda, toyota didnt need one. thats about not letting a Chinese company take over a market we could have dominated here by american companies. they deserve to go under b/c they suck.
and dont get me started on the financial institutes. The market has to be allowed to correct itself in order to learn from its mistakes. I work for Bank of America in the mortgage side of the business and i already see them starting to make some of the same mistakes they were before we had the meltdown b/c we have government money to back us up. its dumb but w/e


Ya, I got the sarcasm but totally agree with your logic. Ford was the only one of the big 3 that didn't get bailed out. GM and Chrysler/Dodge did but thats neither here nor there.

At least you guys on the lower levels of these organizations see the mistakes being made and don't just fall for the he said she said game of politics once everything falls apart again.
 
Top