• Legal Notice – MuscleMecca Forums

    MuscleMecca.com is an educational discussion platform. We do not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or performance-enhancing substances.

    All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing posted on this forum should be considered medical or legal advice.

    Do not attempt to sell, source, or promote illegal substances. Any such activity will result in an immediate and permanent ban and may be reported to the proper authorities.

    By using this site, you agree to comply with all forum rules, disclaimers, and applicable laws in your jurisdiction.

    Read Our Full Disclaimer and Forum Rules

BMR and Questions

PrinceVegeta

PrinceVegeta

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
10,145
Points
63
With the new MD i bought ( march issue ) i got this little booklet with some supp company promotions in it. Nevermind that, what i thought was interesting is stumbling upon the BMR= base metabolic rate and what it is, i knew what it was prior to seeing it but i have never seen how u can calculate it

BMR=66+ (6.23xweight in pounds)+(12.7x height in inches)-(6.8xage in year)

This would be ur metabolic rate

So filled my in

BMR=66+ (6.23xweight in pounds)+(12.7x height in inches)-(6.8xage in year)
PV's BMR= 66+( 6.23x275)+(12.7x71)( im 6'1", hope its correct)-( 6.8x21yo)=

A whopping 2563.35 kcals...

Also they say ur ratios of food no matter what ur goal is must be

40% carbs
40% protein
20% fat

so...it would be for me( in grams)

256,25 protein
same for carbs
57 fat

It also says...if u wanna gain weight, throw an extra 500kcals a day which would equal 3500 kcals a week which is a pund, same goes for losing weight, so u substract 500..

Now my question is...

I wanna lose some of my bf...which would mean i have to eat accroding to this2563-500=2063 kcals a day..

Isnt that too low for me? i train at least 4-5 times a week..woldnt this make me lose muscle?

Hope to get some good responds


Yours truly,

PV :borat:
 
tim290280

tim290280

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
7,956
Points
73
That's the Harris-Benedict equation. Couple of points that need to be added.

The Harris Benedict Equation is a formula that uses your BMR and then applies an activity factor to determine your total daily energy expenditure (calories). The only factor omitted by the Harris Benedict Equation is lean body mass. Remember, leaner bodies need more calories than less leaner ones. Therefore, this equation will be very accurate in all but the very muscular (will under-estimate calorie needs) and the very fat (will over-estimate calorie needs).

Harris Benedict Formula
American "we can't use metric because we want to be behind the times and inaccurate" BMR Formula
Women: BMR = 655 + ( 4.35 x weight in pounds ) + ( 4.7 x height in inches ) - ( 4.7 x age in years )
Men: BMR = 66 + ( 6.23 x weight in pounds ) + ( 12.7 x height in inches ) - ( 6.8 x age in year )

Metric BMR Formula
Women: BMR = 655 + ( 9.6 x weight in kilos ) + ( 1.8 x height in cm ) - ( 4.7 x age in years )
Men: BMR = 66 + ( 13.7 x weight in kilos ) + ( 5 x height in cm ) - ( 6.8 x age in years )

To determine your total daily calorie needs, multiply your BMR by the appropriate activity factor, as follows:

1. If you are sedentary (little or no exercise) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.2
2. If you are lightly active (light exercise/sports 1-3 days/week) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.375
3. If you are moderatetely active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/week) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.55
4. If you are very active (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days a week) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.725
5. If you are extra active (very hard exercise/sports & physical job or 2x training) : Calorie-Calculation = BMR x 1.9
*waits for someone to claim hardgainer status or extra active category* :bitelip:
 
The Creator

The Creator

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
2,487
Points
38
BMR calculations are usually very variable unless they take into account some sort of activity level and lbm. The article tim posted is much more reputable.
 
PrinceVegeta

PrinceVegeta

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
10,145
Points
63
Ok i see, never seen this before so...2365x1.55=3972.65-500 for fat burning=3472.65 which is much more reasonable..

Thanx tim and Creator for the input!
 
Top