Justwonderin
Well-known member
Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Messages
- 86
- Points
- 6
Ok so reading William Llewellyn's Anabolics 9th edition. On page 112 is has a section titled: The "worst" Products
to sum it up basically deca was found (*mind you this is a couple of years old and some of these labs aren't around anymore) to be the worst of all counterfeit roids b/c its harder to make and therefore most UG labs will instead just add a low dose of test to substitute for it hoping the user will not recognize the signs. It added that it will have a similar effect. My question is since its not answered in the book:
How would you be able to tell from taking deca what the difference is compared to Test in terms of the effects it would have on a user of this product.
to sum it up basically deca was found (*mind you this is a couple of years old and some of these labs aren't around anymore) to be the worst of all counterfeit roids b/c its harder to make and therefore most UG labs will instead just add a low dose of test to substitute for it hoping the user will not recognize the signs. It added that it will have a similar effect. My question is since its not answered in the book:
How would you be able to tell from taking deca what the difference is compared to Test in terms of the effects it would have on a user of this product.









is considering it by itself...at least for the first 3 to 4 weeks then running w/ some equipoise. The same book makes several recommendations for things to stack it with but doesn't advise not running it alone even though everyone and i mean everyone I've ever talked to about it says take it w/ a little test. Im not sexually active truth be told. I have a very christian girlfriend who is "waiting" so dont care if my libido drops off.