Flex's new cover choices

[pakiman]

I voted B... his left arm looks soooo crazy
A

B

 

[COACH]

.........Oh my GOD!

 

[dilatedmuscle]

I dont like either, his chest looks small and arms look asymmetrical in both pics.

 

[tkD]

Both are ****ty. The FLEX covers a few years ago were way more interesting. They could have had Phil on the cover with the Sandow or something more "classic". He's the newest Mr Olympia for fuks sake!

 

[pakiman]

The last picture would have made a real good cover!
Flex of November 1989 was the first muscle mag I ever bought!

 

[The King Of Lurkers]

B is sick.... but the arms do look asymetrical from the front ( in the cover of course)

 

[mvsf1]

No question, first one all the way.

 

[Natzo]

The last picture would have made a real good cover!
Flex of November 1989 was the first muscle mag I ever bought!

**** Paki, I wasnt even born..

BTW, the first Flex I ever bought was (I think) the first with Phil after he won the Colorado Pro, the title was : THE FUTURE OF BODYBUILDING Auguste 2006.

 

[yair2210]

love both of them! I think the second one is slightly better.

 

[pakiman]

**** Paki, I wasnt even born..

Show some respect, call me Uncle Paki

BTW its off topic but I'm betting Phil's pic in this cover is flipped... flipped as in his left side is showing as his right!

 

[Hypocrisy86]

Any good comparisons from 2006 to Mr. 0?

 

[Flex]

B is way better than A.

 

[dilatedmuscle]

@ Paki i thought the same thing when natzo posted that cover. I think the first Flex i bought (or was it MD?) was one with Chris Cook holding two black great danes....

@ tkd, i think those pictures are from an old photoshoot, they may release something in the upcoming issue. Unless this issue covers the olympia.

 

[nigster]

Both suck. But if these really are the only options, then I just gotta go with B.