- Thread starter
- #21
M
mvsf1
Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 6,429
- Points
- 38
it is a glaring asymmetry
Where?
it is a glaring asymmetry
You honestly believe this?his legs are small becaause he has no muscle cells up past half of his leg..that the reason right there..some people think bb is partly genetic....I think it 99 percent genetic..or everybody would look almost like Ronnie.
Agreed, being called dumb is over the top and unnecessary. However, the difference is plain as day. I really think it is a neural issue which may not be able to be fixed.
You honestly believe this?
It is quite clear that his right leg has either had an injury or his leading leg has been receiving more stimulation and become dominant and he hasn't fixed this with heavy compound single leg work. You don't get magic differences between limbs, the body will even lose size/strength off dominant limbs/sides of the body in order to maintain a level of equilateral homeostasis. It is also why single leg injuries are often prescribed training for the oposite limb to stop losses to the injured limb.
As for the genetics; I'm yet to hear of anyone that becomes huge without having had to work and eat. Even the freaks with myostatin annomolies still have to eat and work/train/lift. So how the hell does it all come down to genetics? Great way to disregard all the hard work, correct nutrition, athletic ability and drive, commitment, and preseverance.
And no, not everyone would look like Ronnie, because not everyone wants to.
Originally posted by Tim290280
I'm not sure about the insertion, you'd have to see him in real life to make sure.
But yes that wouldn't help and would create a natural imbalance. So I see your point. I'm sure we all have small differences between sides/limbs that may be visually noticeable, but his is quite pronounced and is more than just genetics.