King of lurkers self taken pics

[kn609]

I don't know about you guys, but he doesn't look fat at all to me. Sure, he's pretty high bf but I'd say hovering just around 20%, maybe a little less. 25% is pushing it way far. You would see no apparent sign of muscle if he was that high.
Take a look at these pictures on this site: Body Fat Pictures and Percentages | Leigh Peele
Lurker is way leaner than the guy for the picture at 25% and looks more to the guy of 20%, with some areas carrying more or less fat.

But yes, Lurker, you need to be honest with yourself and take your head out of your ass. Your arms are not by any means lean. And I can tell you mine are 10x leaner than yours and I don't even train. Even if they are half your size. :icon_ninja:

You seriously need to work on those legs. Looks like you never squatted a day in your life. Chill out with the ego training and train your legs.

 

[El Freako]

little? how big are your arms dude? and no i can grab a thing now upload a abs and thighs yourself nd compare it with mine

Edit: Ops sorry just read it i thought you call me that my mistake

I didn't mean physically small. I meant that you're pathetic in your inability to accept critique, your childish replies to such critique and your delusion that everybody should worship your guns. You have big arms but who cares other than you. And no, I'm not going to post a photo of myself. I'm not here to compete with you and am not paricularly concerned with my bf% or my arm size.

Get a life.

 

[tim290280]

 

[dilatedmuscle]

10 pages... LOL

 

[kn609]

Perfect picture that exemplifies King?

 

[The King Of Lurkers]

Perfect picture that exemplifies King?

:iorofl:

I don't know about you guys, but he doesn't look fat at all to me. Sure, he's pretty high bf but I'd say hovering just around 20%, maybe a little less. 25% is pushing it way far. You would see no apparent sign of muscle if he was that high.
Take a look at these pictures on this site: Body Fat Pictures and Percentages | Leigh Peele
Lurker is way leaner than the guy for the picture at 25% and looks more to the guy of 20%, with some areas carrying more or less fat.

But yes, Lurker, you need to be honest with yourself and take your head out of your ass. Your arms are not by any means lean. And I can tell you mine are 10x leaner than yours and I don't even train. Even if they are half your size. :icon_ninja:

You seriously need to work on those legs. Looks like you never squatted a day in your life. Chill out with the ego training and train your legs.

thanks for posting that page Kn609 i told these guys that i was 18% look at the 20% guy i have better condition than him.... i hate to said this to the haters but i told you so:bball:

 

[kn609]

thanks for posting that page Kn609 i told these guys that i was 18% look at the 20% guy i have better condition than him.... i hate to said this to the haters but i told you so:bball:

You're still fat.

hehe, just kidding. You should start dieting down, though, and really focusing on improving the rest of your body. You could probably look pretty decent once you cut down and bring the rest up.

 

[The King Of Lurkers]

You're still fat.

hehe, just kidding. You should start dieting down, though, and really focusing on improving the rest of your body. You could probably look pretty decent once you cut down and bring the rest up.

yes i have cut my carbs about 80% since yesterday

 

[Rageking]

Im not sure those pictures on that site you posted KN are too accurate to what we are looking for. The pictures of the people 20%+ look like they dont know what a gym is, while someone with 20% who lifts alot would probably look alot different than that pic, imo.

 

[The King Of Lurkers]

http://www.musclebomb.com/personal_trainer_nyc_blog/uploaded_images/anthony_makeover-705672.jpg

Heres another comparision

 

[Skeptic]

Not quite sure the guy finishes up at 5%.

Fix your double post.

 

[Pickle]

I don't know about you guys, but he doesn't look fat at all to me. Sure, he's pretty high bf but I'd say hovering just around 20%, maybe a little less. 25% is pushing it way far. You would see no apparent sign of muscle if he was that high.
Take a look at these pictures on this site: Body Fat Pictures and Percentages | Leigh Peele
Lurker is way leaner than the guy for the picture at 25% and looks more to the guy of 20%, with some areas carrying more or less fat.

That website seems bogus, i didn't read much into (how they tested bf) but from the second line id say have to add easily 5% onto all their figures. If blue shorts is 20% bf something ive been in the past I will eat anybodies hat.

 

[The King Of Lurkers]

 

[tim290280]

That website seems bogus, i didn't read much into (how they tested bf) but from the second line id say have to add easily 5% onto all their figures. If blue shorts is 20% bf something ive been in the past I will eat anybodies hat.

I actually felt the numbers looked about right. Most competition lean guys are only around the 6% mark according to the literature. But that is neither here nor there, as the 20% mark is roughly what Lurker is at. I'd have him at low 20's (21% or so). I have not seen anything that suggests otherwise, like abs would suggest low teens, blubber suggests low 20's.

 

[The King Of Lurkers]

Dave Tate Before - 18-20% bodyfat

Dave Tate After - 8-10% bodyfat


link no BS!: http://takeactionfitness.com/getshreddeddiet.html

 

[HATER]

Dude i have fucking 22" inches guns how cant i be special?

LMAOOOOO, hahahaha, best response in the whole thread, lolll

 

[Skeptic]

@ Lurker - What are you trying to prove right here?

 

[The King Of Lurkers]

@ Lurker - What are you trying to prove right here?

That i am at least 18%

 

[Skeptic]

This does not prove anything. You are fatter than Dave Tate at 20%.

If you HONESTLY need to prove yourself POST A PROPER FUCKING PICTURE.

 

[tim290280]

That i am at least 18%

Yes you are at least 18%; 20-22% is at least that being as how it is a larger number.