• Welcome to MuscleMecca Bodybuilding Forums

    Do you love bodybuilding and events like the Olympia and the Arnold Classic? Are you interested in Bodybuilding, Fitness or building muscle? If so check out and join our bodybuilding forum! Musclemecca bodybuilding forums is one of the oldest and most popular bodybuilding, fitness forums! Some members of Musclemecca include Phil Heath, Ronnie Coleman, William Bonac and More! We have over a million bodybuilding videos, pictures and articles and many helpful bodybuilding enthusiasts to answer questions and give you advice on building muscle! See You In the bodybuilding forums!

  • musclemecca does not sell or endorse any bodybuilding products. Do not sell any bodybuilding products through musclemecca bodybuilding forums.
    Musclemecca has no affiliation with advertisers; they simply purchase advertising space here. If you have questions go to their site and ask them directly.
    Advertisers are responsible for the content in their forums.
Silverback Bodybuilding Compounds

More Kratom News

KaiGold

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
4,087
Points
63
As mentoined in this article...If Kratom helps those who are addicted to opiods then why the fuck would the dea be making it a scheduled substance?

kratom_-_Google_Search_2017-07-21_19-44-47.jpg

How technology can help government fight the war on drugs
By John Davis II, opinion contributor


Earlier this month, the Nashville District Attorney completely retired charges against a man named Christopher Miller who was arrested in May by the city’s police for attempting to sell the botanical substance called kratom.


The move brought renewed attention to this naturally occurring product that the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) last year proposed classifying as an illegal Schedule I substance — a plan which the DEA uncharacteristically withdrew, following a public comment period characterized by opposition from a wide range of constituents.


In a previous blog post about competing interests in the e-cigarette market, I described the so-called “Bootlegger and Baptist” theory of regulation, a realpolitik analysis of perhaps the single most effective type of issue-driven coalitions.


The theory’s title refers, of course, to the historical case of alcohol prohibition in America. At the time, those who favored criminalizing booze, beer and wine included mercenary figures who profited handsomely from a black market created by prohibition, along with teetotaling “do-gooders” concerned with saving souls.


The common purpose of these two disconnected groups with profoundly divergent motivations who nonetheless shared the same goal, led to the prohibition of alcohol in 1920.


It was arguably the government’s appetite for lost revenue from taxes on the sale of booze which eventually fueled a successful constitutional amendment in 1933, overturning what the Bootlegger-Baptist coalition had achieved thirteen years earlier.


With current annual opioid sales of around $11 billion in the U.S., projected to grow to $18 billion by 2021, an epidemic of addictions plagues nearly every demographic group in the country.


The fact that kratom helps many hooked individuals kick the dangerous habit, according to various experts and observers, means it has potentially significant economic impacts for pharmaceutical companies selling opioid painkillers.


Given the major addiction epidemic, clearly not all customers for the pharmaceutical companies’ products are consuming them for legitimate medical reasons.


On the issue of whether kratom should be criminalized, viewed one way opioid pharmaceutical makers approximate the Bootlegger part of the equation, without implying any nefarious intent or negligence.


Ostensibly, these companies would profit — or continue to profit, rather — from the DEA making kratom a Schedule I substance, since it purportedly functions as a “reverse gateway” drug, helping opioid addicts beat their habits.


During the public notice and comment process for the DEA’s plan to criminalize kratom, no vocal grassroots constituency emerged in support of the rule — no Baptist to match whatever economic interests (Bootleggers) may have favored the plan.


According to Regendus data, an analytics solution that applies Natural Language Processing to rapidly analyze sentiment contained in public comments, the vast majority of more than 24,000 submissions were strongly opposed to the DEA’s plan.


As a former federal prosecutor and criminal defense attorney, I was personally familiar with the DEA, whose policies and agents I regularly encountered on one side of a courtroom or the other.


On the defense side in particular, the courtroom is where the DEA normally faces opposition to its policies from certain elements of the public, i.e. the accused.


In the war on drugs, the agency’s rules have major, life-changing impacts on individuals, their families and communities.


Many observers of the DEA’s proposal to outlaw kratom and the agency’s eventual withdrawal in the face of strong public opposition on the issue have noted the rarity of the outcome.


In this case, the public leveraged its legal right to comment and influence a rule-making process, to stop a rule in its tracks before their government acted to make them defendants or criminals.


Instead of a loss in the courtroom, anti-kratom interests inside and outside the DEA lost their case in the rule-making process.


John W. Davis II is founder and CEO of N&C Inc., a provider of solutions such as Regendus that help advocates analyze complex content, discover insights, and better represent the interests of clients and stakeholders.

Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...gy-can-help-government-fight-the-war-on-drugs
 
Last edited:

KaiGold

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
4,087
Points
63
View attachment 15912

I have been reading this all over this week. It was actually trending on Google about how the FDA is cracking down on Kratom. It seems the future of Kratom is that it will be labeled just like marijuana or heroin. I do not agree with their assessment! They are actually seizing shipments of Kratom now! Land of the free? I think not! What do you guys think?

Here is some of what I read on npr.

Federal health officials Tuesday issued a warning about kratom, a herbal product being promoted as a safe alternative to opioids for pain that is also marketed for treating addiction, anxiety and depression.


The Food and Drug Administration says there's insufficient evidence the supplement works to treat addiction or other problems and cited growing evidence it can be dangerous. Kratom may cause seizures, liver damage and withdrawal symptoms.


"It's very troubling to the FDA that patients believe they can use kratom to treat opioid withdrawal symptoms," FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said in a statement, adding that not only is there no reliable evidence that kratom is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder, there are FDA-approved medications that work.

"I understand that there's a lot of interest in the possibility for kratom to be used as a potential therapy for a range of disorders," Gottlieb added. "But the FDA has a science-based obligation that supersedes popular trends and relies on evidence."

Source: https://www.npr.org/sections/health...-warns-about-dangers-of-natural-opioid-kratom
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
KaiGold Kratom and More in Glendale Bodybuilding and Sports News 0
MD Bodybuilding Training: Is LESS more? Muscle Video 0

Similar threads

Top