• Legal Notice – MuscleMecca Forums

    MuscleMecca.com is an educational discussion platform. We do not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or performance-enhancing substances.

    All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing posted on this forum should be considered medical or legal advice.

    Do not attempt to sell, source, or promote illegal substances. Any such activity will result in an immediate and permanent ban and may be reported to the proper authorities.

    By using this site, you agree to comply with all forum rules, disclaimers, and applicable laws in your jurisdiction.

    Read Our Full Disclaimer and Forum Rules

Movie that needs to have a sequel

Kakashi2020

Kakashi2020

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
415
Points
18
There are great movies out there that deserves a sequel one such movie is "Constantine", starring Keanu Reeves. It was a very good movie but a decade have past and still no sequel.

What movie do you think needs a sequel?
 
NoviceNinja

NoviceNinja

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2018
Messages
397
Points
18
Inception (2010) - starring Leonardo di Caprio, Tom Hardy, Ellen Page, and Joseph-Gordon Levitt. Leo plays a thief that steals your secrets through your subconscious, the movie is so good and makes your brain work, it deserves a part 2.
 
A

aaron

Member
Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2018
Messages
23
Points
1
If a movie actually "needs" a sequel, doesn't that kind of imply that it's not a good movie? That it was incomplete, that it left you unhappy and unsatisfied?


By the way, I always felt that Master and Commander was probably intended to have a sequel, based on the way it ended. And I would have been happy to see a sequel.
 
Folk Artist

Folk Artist

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
May 30, 2018
Messages
506
Points
18
I think movie sequels are not as good as the original, because the original always has time to develop over time- and you can write and get feedback and rework it, so this could take years but it makes for a good picture. If there is a sequel, they want something fast, especially if the original was a blockbuster and you have to kind of repeat or echo the original so much- but things get rushed to much in this process, so the movie is not so good.
 
A

aaron

Member
Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2018
Messages
23
Points
1
I think movie sequels are not as good as the original, because the original always has time to develop over time- and you can write and get feedback and rework it, so this could take years but it makes for a good picture. If there is a sequel, they want something fast, especially if the original was a blockbuster and you have to kind of repeat or echo the original so much- but things get rushed to much in this process, so the movie is not so good.
Yes!
Almost every movie that has sequels are worse than the original!
 
C

Caguioa747

Banned
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Messages
62
Points
0
For me, It's 2001 a space odeyssey i know they made one in the 80s but it didnt really live up to the original with the movie Gravitys release and amazing visuals i think that they could make an epic film.
 
Top