
COACH
Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2007
- Messages
- 6,193
- Points
- 48
Which is really the better show .. Why?
Think about this one:
If you could choose... what would you be, MrOlympia or an Arnold Classic winner?
It's easy to me.
sometimes an Arnold Classic champ is better than a Mr.O (see ASC 2007 vs Mr.O 2007 :wutyousay, so i'll choose ASC :imcoolurnot:
...agree!!sometimes an Arnold Classic champ is better than a Mr.O (see ASC 2007 vs Mr.O 2007 :wutyousay, so i'll choose ASC :imcoolurnot:
Yeah, but my point is the GLORY.
Yeah, but my point is the GLORY.
ASC. Better judging.
The Olympia is rapidly becoming "The Muscletech Show."
Glory would be if it was fairly won, it seems like when you win the Mr O you can't lose unless you come in like Ronnie did in 06'. But then again, look at Yates most of his years and the last Cutler.
ASC is harder to come in and sweep, because the judging is better most of the time. I say most of the time because somehow Cutler won 3 time there![]()
Glory would be if it was fairly won, it seems like when you win the Mr O you can't lose unless you come in like Ronnie did in 06'. But then again, look at Yates most of his years and the last Cutler.
ASC is harder to come in and sweep, because the judging is better most of the time. I say most of the time because somehow Cutler won 3 time there![]()