Phil Heath vs Dennis Wolf !

[Daniel Andersson]

The pics aren't exactly the same size as you can see...but compare with what you can see

 

[Tunen]

Phil FTW. He KILLS Wolf in the back poses.

 

[Daniel Andersson]

Wolf need to come in sharper and with much more thickness.

 

[Shadow]

All I can say is lighting - it's amazing the difference quality lighting makes at a show

 

[Tunen]

Wolf need to come in sharper and with much more thickness.

And a shorter torso

 

[Tunen]

All I can say is lighting - it's amazing the difference quality lighting makes at a show

Are you being serious?

 

[Braaq]

Now these are some good comparissons other than the light, Heath looks great, but Wolf's size and width will beat out Heath atm.

 

[Braaq]

Phil FTW. He KILLS Wolf in the back poses.

Id would say only in the rear double bi, and barely on that. Wolf wins with his width in the rear lat spread, but Heath has the shredded glutes so it depends on what exactly a particular judge is looking for I suppose.
Stand them next to each other and Wolf's height, width and size when he is on can nudge out Heath for the win right now IMO.

 

[Daniel Andersson]

IMO its thickness vs width

 

[Tunen]

Id would say only in the rear double bi, and barely on that. Wolf wins with his width in the rear lat spread, but Heath has the shredded glutes so it depends on what exactly a particular judge is looking for I suppose.
Stand them next to each other and Wolf's height, width and size when he is on can nudge out Heath for the win right now IMO.

Wolf would prolly win on the Olympia stage yes. He weighs more. Phil is far more muscular though. That is what counts (along with lines, symmetry and proportions) in my book.

 

[Pickle]

rear lat phil is lacking the width but he still looks thick enough to take him. Traps,calves,glutes and tris are all better than wolf in that pose as well

 

[Tunen]

rear lat phil is lacking the width but he still looks thick enough to take him. Traps,calves,glutes and tris are all better than wolf in that pose as well

 

[Braaq]

rear lat phil is lacking the width but he still looks thick enough to take him. Traps,calves,glutes and tris are all better than wolf in that pose as well

I agree, but I think to make a better judgement we would need to see them in the same light on the same stage next to each other. Some of these could go either way, but we cannot say for sure until we see them compared side by side on stage. That is something I am looking forward to. Im hopeing Phil cracks top three at the Mr O this year with Wolf if Victor cannot bring his A game because of his knee.

 

[Turkish1530]

awesome comparison pics DAnny boy!!...............phil obviously had himself an amazing offseason but now we have to wait and compare the 2 once Wolf gets his offseason improvements........

 

[Ryeland]

awesome comparison pics DAnny boy!!...............phil obviously had himself an amazing offseason but now we have to wait and compare the 2 once Wolf gets his offseason improvements........

For sure,

but in those comparisons i would give it to phil. Though the lighting at the ironman is always much better than at the O so its hard to tell.

 

[Zigurd]

In my opinion Wolf wins in almost all the shots. But Phil has better calves.

 

[Beau]

Gotta go with Tunen here...In those pics Phil just looks better all around. Sure Wolf has the height and width but Heath packs more muscle, better seperation, shape etc.

 

[mvsf1]

Phil looks much sharper overall but Wolf legs are noticiable bigger than Phil's. Yeah, Phil back DB looks awesome cause of his glutes, hams and back separation but backlatspread goes to Wolf without any doubt to me.

I'm with Tunen: Wolf's 2007 would beat a 2008 Phil Heat at the Olympia.

 

[mk47]

Wolf wins the first 4 poses, Heath wins the last 4.

 

[chadcruz]

I much prefer Wolf. I think a huge part of that reason has to do with height. I definitely prefer the taller guys than the shorties. To me a taller guy has much more presence than a short guy, even if the short guy is as good as Phil.