-
Legal Notice – MuscleMecca Forums
MuscleMecca.com is an educational discussion platform. We do not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or performance-enhancing substances.
All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing posted on this forum should be considered medical or legal advice.
Do not attempt to sell, source, or promote illegal substances. Any such activity will result in an immediate and permanent ban and may be reported to the proper authorities.
By using this site, you agree to comply with all forum rules, disclaimers, and applicable laws in your jurisdiction.
Bodybuilderdk
Well-known member
Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2007
- Messages
- 298
- Points
- 18
i don't understand whats wrong, if anything his legs aren't as tight as in the first pic, but i don't understand the point of this thread?
M
mvsf1
Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 6,427
- Points
- 63
His legs got a little bit smaller and he was less watery in 2006 but... any mayor changes in my humble opinion...
B
Batmanx007
Well-known member
Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2007
- Messages
- 222
- Points
- 16
It looks to me like he was just dryer in 2006. The man is very very large, and almost 40. It has to be extremely hard to dry out that much mass on such long bones at that age
Tonyk212000
Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2007
- Messages
- 2,517
- Points
- 36
Yeah dont reall see the point in this thread looks the same but just not as hard 
D
DriDDeRz
Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2006
- Messages
- 13,133
- Points
- 38
i would say in the middle picture 2007? he looks bigger in the lats compared to first picture - 2006 and 3rd picture - 2008.
but not as ripped in the quads in 2007/ 2008 compared to 2006 picture(first one)
just my 2 cents
but not as ripped in the quads in 2007/ 2008 compared to 2006 picture(first one)
just my 2 cents
Similar threads
MrChewiebitums
