Natzo
Elvira turns me on
VIP
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
- Messages
- 10,706
- Points
- 48
Last edited by a moderator:
his awesome routine from 2007
Considering the fact that the posing routine isnt even scored anymore, what constitutes BB posing? I thought it was displaying your physique in the best way. You guys are assuming that Rusty Jeffers is the apex of BB posing yet it is subjective at this point since there are no guidelines other than displaying your physique. You guys are talking about hitting mandatory's but thats what the Pre-judging and mandatory poses are for and judged. Seems like you guys want pre-judging posing with smooth transition and photo-op stances. The posing routine isnt even judged anymore so whatever criteria it had is already lost, you step on stage and display your physique however you want. Nobody poses like Kai, he is an originator to his style when it comes to professional bodybuilding so in some ways he is a master at posing. Rusty Jeffers is simply taking the same poses that have been used for decades. Kai's posing and pauses while unconventional and controversial are often new. Who ever originated those poses used by Rusty and many others was just like Kai, a true originator who tried something different. His poses were less sexually provocative but they come from an era of a sexually repressed and conservative society which is probably why they are more widely accepted.
Jesus fucking christ, does that logic actually come full-circle in your head?
In other news: dat 'stache.
First, thanks for not reading my post as being overtly laced with vitriol, as I was at least attempting to be somewhat humorous and/or facetious. But on to the topic at hand, if the posing round isn't scored anymore, then it wouldn't be subjective, as the judging in a bodybuilding show is already an inherently subjective endeavor; it would be, well, nothing. In this, the posing round can be seen, and moreover interpreted, by the competitors as they see fit, though I still approach the carte blanche interpretation that you're positing with some hesitance. To master posing, one must go beyond innovation. While important, originating new styles of displaying one's physique is only important insofar as said styles have some practical application. You hinted at cultural relevance, which is a good enough jumping off point, but I think you're missing the point with what you addressed in way of social ramification/reaction. I doubt, and highly at that, that Jeffers's classical approach to posing is rooted in sexual conservativeness or repression, and instead is merely a byproduct of more a conventional way of showcasing one's strengths; there's a reason those stances gained popularity throughout bodybuilding's golden age. The idea that Kai is subverting the norms associated with sexual acceptance would only ring true if there existed some nexus between his routines and preconceived barriers of discretion. In my opinion, the only link that surfaces between the two, at least in the case of Kai, is one employed by outsiders -- I don't think there's enough evidence to suggest that he's willfully challenging the concepts of taste. More likely is that he's using his background as an exotic dancer, coupled with his physical dexterity and limberness, to do something new, yes, but this has to do more with his own professional ecology and not with epochal shifts. In our context, mastery comes from the acuity one demonstrates in displaying their build, not merely with invention. Think about it this way: there are a ton of useless inventions out there -- it's what we ESTPers do. But it's how these original ideas and fit into applicable paradigms that truly separates conceptual mastery and flaccid innovation. Hopefully that makes sense.How is that illogical?