Which conspiracy theories do you believe in?

[Ryeland]

lol, here we go again.

The last time I was asked questions like this, I researched and found all the questions to be fake propaganda created by anti-government liars. (referring to 9/11 "truth")

How about, you tell me what EVIDENCE you have? Because without EVIDENCE, all you have is speculation and personal opinions.

Some of that stuff could be coincidental.

Here is my rock solid evidence. There was one shot that entered his back, below the shoulders. There was one shot that entered his neck from the front. Then there was the kill shot from the front that took off the back portion of his skull.

How is it possible for one shooter to accomplish this?

How did he manage to get off 3 shots from a bolt action rifle at a moving target in under 6 seconds? Cause that's what he would have to have done.

When shot, JFK's head moved back and to the left due to the impact of the bullet. That is inconsistent with a shooter from the back and to the right (as where Oswald would have been).

Where is your evidence that Oswald was the lone shooter?

 

[Zigurd]

Moon landing.
9/11 (not everything verbatim)
Alien contact never happening.

 

[Flex]

There was one shot that entered his neck from the front. Then there was the kill shot from the front that took off the back portion of his skull.

From the front? Nope. Speculation, no evidence.

How did he manage to get off 3 shots from a bolt action rifle at a moving target in under 6 seconds? Cause that's what he would have to have done.

All three bullets matched to the rifle. More speculation, no evidence.

When shot, JFK's head moved back and to the left due to the impact of the bullet. That is inconsistent with a shooter from the back and to the right (as where Oswald would have been).

Speculation once again, still no evidence. His head moving back means nothing, this is something experts have investigated and all came to the same conclusion.

Where is your evidence that Oswald was the lone shooter?

I don't need evidence. That was the conclusion of several different in-depth investigations. The FBI, the Warren Commission, the HSCA, and several others all came the the same conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman and fired three shots at president Kennedy.

You are the one with the outlandish conspiracy theories, with no evidence of any kind.

 

[Ryeland]

From the front? Nope. Speculation, no evidence.

Jackie Kennedy moved to the trunk of the car to collect a piece of JFK's skull. The back of JFK's head being blown off while the front was intact is clear indication that the rear of the skull was the exit wound. Don't Believe me? Check out the photo, I apologize for not posting it directly, but it is quite graphic.


Autopsy Photo

If Oswald had landed the fatal headshot from behind and above it would have entered the rear of the skull and blown the front of his face off, this picture from his Autopsy clearly shows his face and front of his skull intact while the rear is decimated.

All three bullets matched to the rifle. More speculation, no evidence.

Still doesn't explain how Oswald was capable of firing off three bullets from a bolt action rifle in under 6s while landing "2" kill shots (one of them being a "magic bullet") on a moving target. A feat that the FBI tried to get their sharpshooters to repeat yet were unable to do so.

Speculation once again, still no evidence. His head moving back means nothing, this is something experts have investigated and all came to the same conclusion.

Which experts? Which studies? His head moving back and to the left does mean something according to the the well proven law of conservation of momentum. It clearly indicates a shot from the front and to the right. Unless we are contradicting elementary laws of physics now.

I don't need evidence. That was the conclusion of several different in-depth investigations. The FBI, the Warren Commission, the HSCA, and several others all came the the same conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman and fired three shots at president Kennedy.

Yeah I have read these reports. They are fraught with errors. One look at the Warren Commission's "Single Bullet Theory" shows just how plausible that report is. The idea that one bullet can cause 7 wounds on two people shattering several bones in one of the victims and still be almost 100% intact is laughable. A simple study of ballistics will refute this.

There are also many other investigations that have come to agree with my point of view that there was more than one gunman. What about them Flex, are they summarily wrong?

You are the one with the outlandish conspiracy theories, with no evidence of any kind.

I have presented evidence. You are the one who has not. Nothing you have presented amounts to evidence in anyway. Many of the studies you have cited have been proven to be full of inaccuracies. You call my theories outlandish yet accept the Warren Commission in its entirety including the magic bullet theory, not outlandish at all.

But hey apparently you don't need evidence to support your opinions.

 

[Flex]

You still have yet to present evidence.

I find it laughible that you find this type of balogney "evidence." Let the experts do their job, while you continue your five-click google searches.

Your argument is very poor.

 

[Flex]

I am not disputing 9/11 at all, or telling you to pull your head out of your ass. I would not say I am a conspiracy theorist. I don't spend an inordinate amount of time generating theories.

JFK holds interest for me because its A) a pivotal moment in american history B) a great deal of confusion about the day.

That post had nothing to do with you.

 

[Ryeland]

You still have yet to present evidence.

I find it laughible that you find this type of balogney "evidence." Let the experts do their job, while you continue your five-click google searches.

Your argument is very poor.

Thank you for insulting me and assuming that my "evidence" is all based on 5 click google searches. Your tone of utter disrespect is much appreciated.

For a guy who just went on a rant against ignorance you are certainly demonstrating some right now.

Seeing as you have clearly have no interest in a rational, logical discussion I will bow out of this one. Have a good night.

 

[Flex]

Thank you for insulting me and assuming that my "evidence" is all based on 5 click google searches. Your tone of utter disrespect is much appreciated.

For a guy who just went on a rant against ignorance you are certainly demonstrating some right now.

Seeing as you have clearly have no interest in a rational, logical discussion I will bow out of this one. Have a good night.

Negative, the reason I have no interest is because your argument is so poor.

"HIS HEAD WHIPPED BACKWARDS!!!"
"THE MEDIA WASN'T THERE..OMG!!"
"HE SHOT BULLETS SUPER DUPER FAST!!!!"

None of these are worth responding to, or even wasting my time researching. Fact is, there is zero evidence that killing JFK was an inside job, you just want to believe he was killed by the government.

 

[Oloz]

As for JFK, I only believe Lee Harvey Oswald was involved. I don't find it that hard to believe, as he seemed to hate American society. Besides, he had already attempted murder in 1963 of General Walker. Oswald was a very anti-social person and hated America, so it would make no sense for the government to work with him. The theories of the driver shooting JFK are retarded, and remind me of all the dumb conspiracies involved with 9/11. If the government wanted JFK dead, they would do it in closed quarters away from all the video cameras and people.

Know that when LHO was arrested outside of the theater, they found X amount of bullet casings on the ground claiming that he shot the police officer, yet he had a revolver, which doesn't expel bullet casings.

The warren commission is absolutely ridiculous. I had to do a research paper on this sophomore year in college and found some pretty interesting things.

I believe the mob/government killed JFK. Check out the book Double Cross written by Sam Giancanna's nephew. There's some interesting stuff in there.

 

[Oloz]

I'm trying to find my notes from my english class, there's a lot of interesting stuff written down.

 

[Oloz]

Also, Oswald's nickname in the Marines was "Maggies Drawers" meaning he was a extremely poor shot. It's hard to believe someone with that nickname could, unfortunately, pull off that good of shooting, let alone shoot 3 bullets in that 5.6 seconds.

 

[Ironslave]

I've just researched JFK a fair bit.... I'm really not sure what happened. I find this odd how his press secretary Kilduff explains the shot.

Initially, the first reaction is Newtonian physics, which would have conservation of momentum. Perhaps Glex or someone else who knows more physics than I could chime in, but it almost seems like the classic "bullet hits a hanging block of wood" example. I do realize it isn't that simple, so I will defer to a physicist, because I hate physics.

I'm not sure why Oswald called himself a Patsy either, or all the connections to Ruby. Was Oswald involved? I think that is obvious... was he alone? I doubt it.

 

[mvsf1]

* 9/11 was an inside job (poorly displayed, lots of errors)
* JFK was proly an inside job as well.
* New world order (related to 9/11)

moon landing. that whole thing just seemed way too convenient.

I do believe in moon landing just because USSR admitted the fact.

 

[tkD]

Tupac is still alive and kickin...

 

[cereal]

JFK
9/11
AIDS (virus made in lab)
fluoride water
aspartame
Bilderberg
nutritional and pharmaceutical industry