Cutsjr
Well-known member
Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2006
- Messages
- 109
- Points
- 16
They sure do, get your front row seat and rule book and you'll see.I have plenty of knowledge. The judges don't go by who's best at the Olympia. Deal with it.
They sure do, get your front row seat and rule book and you'll see.I have plenty of knowledge. The judges don't go by who's best at the Olympia. Deal with it.
Your bias is showing.They sure do, get your front row seat and rule book and you'll see.
Its true to an extent though....i've never been to the Olympia but pictures never show you everything....i found that out when i was at the Arnold this year. Phil IMO had the show....then you see pics and it doesnt do justice. So much different seeing these guys up close then judging from picsYour bias is showing.
Everyone is a little bias on here, but I did talk to an IFBB Judge following the Olympia and Arnold. In the O Vic faded as the posing went on and Jay got better, so Vic was in fact winning at one point. In the Arnold, Dex had a more mature muscle look to him with a little more thickness. I had the process explained to me by an IFBB judge that was at both events judging, so my bias has nothing to do with it.Your bias is showing.
Everyone is a little bias on here, but I did talk to an IFBB Judge following the Olympia and Arnold. In the O Vic faded as the posing went on and Jay got better, so Vic was in fact winning at one point. In the Arnold, Dex had a more mature muscle look to him with a little more thickness. I had the process explained to me by an IFBB judge that was at both events judging, so my bias has nothing to do with it.
I'm not speaking of the differences in seeing a muscle belly or a physique move in person as opposed to pictures but of a generally accepted theory that the Olympia caters to heavier bodybuilders and past names and champions. To say the best physiques win just because the judges have good seats is silly. They are forced to make decisions at far too rapid a pace and most of them do not have a proper system in place in terms of mentally sorting the quality of athletes in enough time. The ridiculous notion of "so-and-so won 5 out of 8 poses so they're the best bodybuilder" isn't the way a show should be judged and I truly hope that's not what they fall back on because that was not purported principals behind making them mandatory in the first place.Its true to an extent though....i've never been to the Olympia but pictures never show you everything....i found that out when i was at the Arnold this year. Phil IMO had the show....then you see pics and it doesnt do justice. So much different seeing these guys up close then judging from pics
Jay did not fade in 06, he tightened up, the same as did Ronnie that night. Jay was just dialed in better from the start. I agree at the 07 that Vic had it in the beginning, but as I said the IFBB judge clarified things for me that the pics and webcast did not. Although we don't all agree with the rules, they are what they are at this point in time.If that is the case then ask the IFBB judge you talked to why the same reward (the Mr. O title) was not given to Ronnie in 06' when he got better throughout the night and Jay faded a bit??? It's because, whether we want to admit it or not, the politics in our sport is quite prevalent.
This is not how shows are judged. Either you misunderstood him, he explained the process poorly, or one of the two of you are an idiot.Everyone is a little bias on here, but I did talk to an IFBB Judge following the Olympia and Arnold. In the O Vic faded as the posing went on and Jay got better, so Vic was in fact winning at one point.
Maybe your the Idiot not understanding. As the posing went on Jay got better(lost the fluid he was retaining), and Vic got worse(flattened out). And yes, the shows are judged this way, that is why it is a two day show, Prejudging and Final Judging. Are you an IFBB Pro Judge? No, didn't think so, but good try. Do you understand now? If you can't be mature without the name calling, don't bother responding.
I could care less who you or anyone else thinks is better. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. You guys are still wining cuz Vic did not win. Yes, in the beginning of the O Vic was better, but he was not by end of it. That's the bottom line. Get over it.At my part I dont know how its judged... BUT you are crying to everyone that "you eint IFBB judge so you dont know how its judged" so ARE YOU ifbb judge? You seem to know how the thing is done, so put up the picture of your judge card... And I think you are just getting mad because we /and everyone else are thinkin Victor was way better than Jay...
I referred to you or the judge possibly being an idiot as a viable option as to how things are explained. Don't patronize me if you can't understand context.Maybe your the Idiot not understanding. As the posing went on Jay got better(lost the fluid he was retaining), and Vic got worse(flattened out). And yes, the shows are judged this way, that is why it is a two day show, Prejudging and Final Judging. Are you an IFBB Pro Judge? No, didn't think so, but good try. Do you understand now? If you can't be mature without the name calling, don't bother responding.
As the posing went on Jay got better(lost the fluid he was retaining), and Vic got worse(flattened out). And yes, the shows are judged this way, that is why it is a two day show, Prejudging and Final Judging. Are you an IFBB Pro Judge? No, didn't think so, but good try. Do you understand now? If you can't be mature without the name calling, don't bother responding.
Kai was never a "porn star" and you're thinking in overly simplistic terms as a whole. That's not to say that there isn't a marketing derived influence on the judging but it's hardly as pertinent as you claim it to be.there is no way the weider empire would let (kai) an ex porn star win their golden event. Its not about who deserves to win its about who will sell the most magazines and supplements after winning. Its just a money thing and the goose who can lay the biggest golden egg for the weiders will be crownd.