Official Ironman 2009 scorecard

[tkD]

ifbb.com

 

[DCuts85]

Bull shit to say the Moe was only one point out of first.... I don't agree at all with 2nd and 3rd placing, should be switched.

 

[Samoan-Z]

4th he score: 9 to silvio's 8

I agree too man, Rockel had 2nd by the balls, he should have gotten it.

 

[PrinceVegeta]

^i agree totally..rockel should have placed second

 

[curtisymoo]

i never liked moes physique.


^^ yes rockel for second as well

 

[Hypocrisy86]

Yea Ronny should have got second

 

[chadcruz]

Thanks for posting the score card. Its always good to see how close the final placings are.

 

[tkD]

Digital version of the scorecard

 

[DriDDeRz]

Wow... Hide wasn't that far away from 3rd place

 

[Duality]

can someone please explain to me how the scoring works for this? i really don't follow the whole rounds thing and the subsequent numbers and how they add up to the placings.

 

[DriDDeRz]

Muscle proportion from upper body to lower body, left to right of each side
Conditioning, muscle detail,
skeletal bone structure

there's a few more the judge the scoring on

 

[tim290280]

Con didn't place top 10??

I'm going to have to see some pics.

Actually he looked kinda flat and small. Clearly didn't prepare as well as he should have.

 

[DriDDeRz]

Con didn't place top 10??

I'm going to have to see some pics.

Actually he looked kinda flat and small. Clearly didn't prepare as well as he should have.

he looked really small on stage compared to the rest of the guys on stage, i actually lol'd when they said,

"Well he is 4 x Mr Australia, so he must be doing something right"
i just laughed in embarrassment

 

[Duality]

Muscle proportion from upper body to lower body, left to right of each side
Conditioning, muscle detail,
skeletal bone structure

there's a few more the judge the scoring on

lol, you misunderstand me. i'm not asking what a judge looks for in judging a physique (good God, that's like bodybuidling 101) i'm asking how does the scoring system work? i really don't get what all those numbers mean on the scorecard.

 

[PrinceVegeta]

^^ the lower the number they give u the better, so 1 is a perfect score, thats all i know

 

[Gumby51cm]

^^ the lower the number they give u the better, so 1 is a perfect score, thats all i know

5 is a perfect score. i know how most score cards work, but this one is weird.

Normally..... 7 judges. Number each individual by the number they should place ( silvio should have placed 1st, he gets a number 1).

lets say one judge puts silvio in second. out of the seven judges, this would equal a total of 8 (1+1+1+1+1+1+2). so second, for the sake of arguement would end up being (2+2+2+2+2+2+1)=13 pts. now the highest and lowest score for each competitor is dropped. Silvio losses a 1 and a 2....his total is 5 pts. Second place loses a 2 and a 1. this leaves him with 10pts. This would be a perfect score for first, and a perfect score for second.

However, i dont know why the scores end up being so high on this card. i think even for the olympia it ends up being the 5, 10, 15 scheme.