Phil Heath (08) vs Ronnie Coleman (03)

[Line]

weren't you in chat when we had a discussion about this thread? he said that Heath smokes Ronnie..

Apparently not.

Ive always liked Ronnie but Phil is over the top hands down, maybe mass Ronnie looks bigger but Phil has mass and hella definition. I think Phils gonna be the next generation ronnie

I don't even know where to begin with this one.

 

[Braaq]

I do not even to look at the pics to know that Ronnie wins hands down. (I did look of course )

 

[nigster]

Ronnie all the way. Ron outmasses Phil by what...40 pounds?

 

[shutupnsquat]

Look.. i know Phil has made some unreal improvements and def has one of the most impressive physiques out there... but i mean comon... u cant start comparing him to the greatest BB ever when Phil hasnt even won an olympia yet.... its not close if '03 ronnie stands next to phil

 

[Daniel Andersson]

Ronnie all the way. Ron outmasses Phil by what...40 pounds?

50lbs...

 

[Rocky]

Ron takes this without even a fight. Phil has the smaller/tighter midsection - that's it!

 

[SerbMarko]

about the waist difference.. yes Phil has a tighter and smaller waist, but lets get real, Ronnie has 50 more pounds of muscle to hold up.. the waist is just like any other muscle, it grows to adapt to the rest of the body, we have seen pics with Ronnie and a tight/small weight, but he was also a hell of a lot smaller.. one must sacrifice a bit of size in the waist in order to attain more muscle on his frame, its just that simple.. plus a small waist on a guy Ronnie's size wouldn't look right anyways.

 

[Deathmaggot]

plus a small waist on a guy Ronnie's size wouldn't look right anyways.

thats something i think about lot of times when i see massmonsters getting critizized by his gut

 

[SerbMarko]

if one wants to get really technical, then compare the smaller waist 1999 Ronnie to Heath..

 

[SerbMarko]

why the hell is Ronnie listed as 258 lbs in 2003??

 

[Daniel Andersson]

Thats what "they" estimate he was going to weigh
Complete bullshit to estimate someones weight like that though..

 

[Flash]

I meant for thier frames, i think they both have a lot of mass, ronnie ya had over the top mass but Phil i think holds his muscle, he doesnt look freakishly huge and looks like how a bb should look (to me). Like Ruhl he had a crap load of mass, great bb but to me wasnt the classic bb like the old timers that i like. Ronnie looked freakish (in a good way) but to me Heath looks like the classic bb but the new generation. I guess im blind but the pics the only thing I see ronnie totally owning on is back lat spread the rest i think is phil, look at mass vs definition, phil has both. this is my opinion so thats what i think

 

[Daniel Andersson]

O M F G ....THAT BACK!

 

[SerbMarko]

Ronnie gettin jiggy wittt it on stage haha

 

[OH_Broker]

There really is no comparison, Big Ron all the way!

 

[Ironslave]

Let's all publicly ridicule those who voted for Phil.

 

[Pickle]

ronnie from that year wins all poses

can we have a phil heath vs pains sis comparison next?

 

[Ryeland]

ronnie from that year wins all poses

can we have a phil heath vs pains sis comparison next?

Do we have pics of phil on his knees? cause if we don't pain's sis would be way out of her element.

 

[Skeptic]

I voted Phil.... i personally think his physique is much more pleasing to the eye... and much more proportional from top to bottom

 

[hydro]

ronnie was huge in 03 but i think he looked better in 99 maybe the lighting helped with that, the people who r sayn phil is beta than ronnie at ronnies peak havent got a clue, then phil should win the olympia this year?, coz if 99, 03 or even 00 ronnie competed in this years olympia he would win preiod.