nigster
Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 2,603
- Points
- 38
2007 it was more than that, but I assume you already knew that.The only flaw in Ronnie is midsection.
The only structural flaws on Phil is midsection and narrow shoulder line.
Legal Notice – MuscleMecca Forums
MuscleMecca.com is an educational discussion platform. We do not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or performance-enhancing substances.
All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing posted on this forum should be considered medical or legal advice.
Do not attempt to sell, source, or promote illegal substances. Any such activity will result in an immediate and permanent ban and may be reported to the proper authorities.
By using this site, you agree to comply with all forum rules, disclaimers, and applicable laws in your jurisdiction.
2007 it was more than that, but I assume you already knew that.The only flaw in Ronnie is midsection.
why don't you illuminate us with your unridicolous opinion?This is the most ridiculous post I've read today, and that's saying something.
why don't you illuminate us with your unridicolous opinion?
i guess you would start from aesthetics and dryness which,in my opinion have little to cope with real bb.
i'm definitey happy coleman have saved bb from flex wheeler's kinds of physique.
beside that, does anybody in this forum know if ronnie is training or is supposed to, in order to come back somwhen?
yeah, with his training partner arnold swarzenneger
but i agree they prefered ronnie over flex and the mr o tended to the mass instead of the class
to the thread: COLEMAN > phil
also:
COLEMANs best ever>phils best ever
why don't you think it possible for ronnie to come back, maybe in a couple of years if he recovers from injury?
i think he'd still be the best
Start being a little more realistic...he is 42 y/o or is it 43?....in a couple of years he has no chance, even less then he does right now
if you look at 2007 relentless i think he was still the best but on stage his condition was off i don't know why.
if he could do it in 2007 why not in 2009. it's only a couple of years

compare the 03' ronnie to phil and tell me there's a comparison...didn't think so
Well for starters I judge physiques as objectively as possible, factoring in all criterion that one can and weighing them in what I think is an appropriate manner in proportion to how things are usually judged or awarded; I tweak my opinions a bit from there though based on where the sport can, or should, take us scientifically and what would be best for the future (ie. athletes health, realistic standards, etc...).why don't you illuminate us with your unridicolous opinion?
Yes, you don't like aesthetics and we know it. If I were to guess why it would be an expansion on what I mentioned above about having the outsider's mentality. My thought is that you could just consider yourself, and the sport, to be overtly hardcore and that mass and strength should rule and nothing that would in any way appease the public eye be rewarded. As for your argument regarding dryness, it doesn't make any sense or hold any water (pun intended). At this point you're basically chopping your critical mindset off at the knees because you seem to only be backing pure, unadulterated mass and, I hate to break it to you, almost anyone can be big.d.capodiferro said:i guess you would start from aesthetics and dryness which,in my opinion have little to cope with real bb.
Saved how? I have no idea what you're trying to say here, nor do I understand your undying love for muscle mass.d.capodiferro said:i'm definitey happy coleman have saved bb from flex wheeler's kinds of physique.
Lightweight would probably be the guy to ask.d.capodiferro said:beside that, does anybody in this forum know if ronnie is training or is supposed to, in order to come back somwhen?
Daniel, any chance of seeing Ronnie 03 vs. Phil? We know Ronnie wins, but it would be interesting just to see.
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and acknowledge the following:
MuscleMecca.com does not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or pharmaceutical products.
Advertisers are fully responsible for their content. Use this section at your own risk.
All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as medical, legal, or purchasing advice.
Illegal activity is strictly prohibited and may result in permanent bans.