Phil Heath: 2011 vs 2010 Mr Olympia

[tkD]

I know, I know, scalling isn't perfect. It's the best and fastest I could do.

 

[Natzo]

great improvement from the back - and that might win him the O.

More dense, bigger, perfect condition, crisp - BETTER!


thanks Daniel!

 

[tkD]

great improvement from the back - and that might win him the O.

More dense, bigger, perfect condition, crisp - BETTER!


thanks Daniel!

Agreed. Everything looks better this year: smaller waist, last year looked a bit bloated in some pics, this year not, @ 5 lbs bigger than last year (like he said in some interviews, and it shows in the back especially!), much better condition, harder, drier, improved hams, better posing for front lat spread, rear lat spread, FDB, MM etc, quads look bigger, back wider and thicker and so on.

Big improvements if u ask me, and it shows next to Jay and the rest. And if he wins (which he should), it's gonna be awesome!

 

[tkD]

This must be mvsf1's reaction to all the Phil should win, he's better than Jay, bla bla bla..


:icon_mrgreen:

 

[oldez]

Thanks tkD. He has improved everywhere, but for me the development of his delts is the most striking. His posing has also improved. In some shots his quads looked almost as big as Jays. Too bad Phil does not yet have the muscle maturity to have cuts like Jay.

 

[tkD]

In some shots his quads looked almost as big as Jays.

 

[mvsf1]

Guys, I could buy your "Phil is better today than Jay", I disagree but it's ok to me. BUT: judging by the pics you uploaded, I can't see THA HUGE difference between 2010 and 2011 Phil Heath. In fact, he's 99% the same. And that's not good or bad, he could win tonight with the same package as 2010, because Jay's not as good as one year ago, but all that "Phil made insane improvements" is just bull****.

 

[Line]

Guys, I could buy your "Phil is better today than Jay", I disagree but it's ok to me.

HAHahahahahaha.

 

[oldez]

Guys, I could buy your "Phil is better today than Jay", I disagree but it's ok to me. BUT: judging by the pics you uploaded, I can't see THA HUGE difference between 2010 and 2011 Phil Heath. In fact, he's 99% the same. And that's not good or bad, he could win tonight with the same package as 2010, because Jay's not as good as one year ago, but all that "Phil made insane improvements" is just bull****.

I have heard they can do amazing things with Lasik surgery.

 

[HeavyWeight_86]

Phil came in dryer and lighter than last year, that's why he looks bigger, obviously a Pro will hype his weight especially a light superheavy like him, for show purpose. 10' AND 11' are the same package, just a bit dryer, but the back is the same he just hit the rls differently in the 11' pic, he's pushing his back muscles more outside to enhance the separation, that's it. Phil won as best man in the roster, but not on a 100% Cutler, or Kai, which proved more than once they can beat beat him so...

 

[pakiman]

This year Phil was crisper and with a thicker/denser back... and when he stood next to a Jay Cutler that was bloated and dazed at pre-judging, he blew him away so far behind it was impossible for Jay to catchup no matter what he had done at the finals!

 

[atomic strenght]

i won't say huge improvements but yes noticeable improvements in the back and delts and even the biceps and the legs.if you can't see it then take a look again.

 

[tkD]

a few others, not mine this time, credits to flangmasterj from bb.com

 

[Natzo]

Back shot difference is astonishing!

he won it from the back.

 

[dilatedmuscle]

He was fuller last year but this year he was a lil bigger, harder and maybe has more muscle maturity.

Most bodybuilders' fullness peaks at a young age and they then get a tad flatter and more dense. Phil isnt so much big as he is full, it will be interesting how he will look 7ish years from now.