R
Ruhlforever
Well-known member
Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2007
- Messages
- 395
- Points
- 16
Incredible but NAAAAAARRRRROWWWWWWWW. Sorry guys not a hater but MUST increase pecs and also master that pose
Legal Notice – MuscleMecca Forums
MuscleMecca.com is an educational discussion platform. We do not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or performance-enhancing substances.
All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing posted on this forum should be considered medical or legal advice.
Do not attempt to sell, source, or promote illegal substances. Any such activity will result in an immediate and permanent ban and may be reported to the proper authorities.
By using this site, you agree to comply with all forum rules, disclaimers, and applicable laws in your jurisdiction.
What pose?Incredible but NAAAAAARRRRROWWWWWWWW. Sorry guys not a hater but MUST increase pecs and also master that pose
Incredible but NAAAAAARRRRROWWWWWWWW. Sorry guys not a hater but MUST increase pecs and also master that pose

How's he hitting it wrong or even suboptimally, for that matter? If you compare that picture to this from the Arnold, he doesn't appear to be doing anything different, yet variations in conditioning and camerawork yield expectedly variable results. I'm not saying this is his best pose, or even a particularly strong one for Phil (and sure, a thicker chest would certainly behoove him here), but I don't understand your criticism as stated.[pic of Phil doing front lat spread]
How's he hitting it wrong or even suboptimally, for that matter? If you compare that picture to this from the Arnold, he doesn't appear to be doing anything different, yet variations in conditioning and camerawork yield expectedly variable results. I'm not saying this is his best pose, or even a particularly strong one for Phil (and sure, a thicker chest would certainly behoove him here), but I don't understand your criticism as stated.
![]()
But that pose is hardly about width, as hand position (moving them up or down the body) can create the illusion of a wider or narrower physique, depending on how the elbows protrude from one's core. Sure, his chest could use some mass, but how can he possibly improve the width of his pecs and, moreover, how would that help him create a wider looking physique? In a front lat spread, its more pertinent to increase the size of lats (duh), shoulders, and arms if a widened look is what one is after. Really, Phil fills out his frame nicely in that shot, sans chest thickness, which, yes, can be improved. But still, you're comparing him to Dexter and saying Phil's more narrow? I don't know about that. Perhaps Dex has better filled out his frame but he's certainly not wider in an absolute sense.Yeh thanks for the pic. Yeah this is the pose everybody (Experts including Chris Cormier on Flex) says is not the strong pose for Phil due to CLAVICLE deficit, however everybody is pointing out that Heath is really capable of increasing size, depth and width of his pecs in order to match as an example Dexter, Jay, Kai Or Vic that are ultra WIDE.
Phil could benefit greatly from hitting a vacuum in both his front lat spread and front double bi
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and acknowledge the following:
MuscleMecca.com does not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or pharmaceutical products.
Advertisers are fully responsible for their content. Use this section at your own risk.
All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as medical, legal, or purchasing advice.
Illegal activity is strictly prohibited and may result in permanent bans.