• Welcome to MuscleMecca Bodybuilding Forums

    Do you love bodybuilding and events like the Olympia and the Arnold Classic? Are you interested in Bodybuilding, Fitness or building muscle? If so check out and join our bodybuilding forum! Musclemecca bodybuilding forums is one of the oldest and most popular bodybuilding, fitness forums! Some past members of Musclemecca include Phil Heath, Ronnie Coleman, Gregg Valentine and More! We have over a million bodybuilding videos, pictures and articles! We have many helpful bodybuilding enthusiasts to answer questions and give you advice on building muscle! See You In The Bodybuilding Forums!

  • musclemecca bodybuilding forums does not sell or endorse any bodybuilding products. Do not sell any bodybuilding products through musclemecca bodybuilding forums.
    Musclemecca.com has no affiliation with advertisers; they simply purchase advertising space here. If you have questions go to their site and ask them directly.
    Advertisers are responsible for the content in their forums.
Steroidify

Who brought a better combination of size and conditioning?

  • Ronnie Coleman '03 (5'11", 287 lbs.)

    Votes: 106 82.2%
  • Jay Cutler '06 (5'9", roughly 280 lbs.)

    Votes: 23 17.8%

  • Total voters
    129

Flex

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
6,519
Points
0
I noticed someone mentioned Jay Cutler was the best combined package of size and conditioning this year. I'm sure many Ronnie Coleman fans would argue with that, especially because of Ronnie Coleman's 2003 appearance. Which do you think is the better package?













[#]Ronnie Coleman[/#]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BigBen

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
5,141
Points
38
I biased, but u know i like ronnie coleman, so coleman has the better package, his physique looks better to me, jay cutler has more detail in the legs, thats it. Ronnies physique is more pleasing to me, jay looks blocky, and rons lines flow better.

But everyone is gonna have their own argument
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Paulie

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
2,711
Points
0
Im going to go ahead and say Jay Cutler in '06 just because I prefer jays physique over big rons. They both look amazing.

Bigben - I dont really think Jay Cutler is blocky. Ruhl is one of the most blocky physiques, and thats the only one that really stands out the most.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Line

Chaos reigns.
VIP
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,852
Points
0
I'm sorry but this isn't even close. The 2003 version of Ronnie probably the best combination of size, condition, and shape we've ever seen. Jay in 2006 looked great and it was a personal best for him but the '03 Ron is arguably the best we've seen from anyone.

Just watch his prejudging video from 2003...pictures don't do him justice.
 

fistacuffs

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
119
Points
0
Im fairly neutral when it comes to Ronnie vs. Jay
BUT

If you listen to Pro Bodybuilding weekly radio show with BOB CHICK and DAN when they had Jay on - he said that Ronnie in 2003 was the best physique in bodybuilding! From the horses mouth! Granted everyone has their personal favorite physiques - but Ronnie wins this one !
 

sexnews

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
4,073
Points
0
fistacuffs said:
Im fairly neutral when it comes to Ronnie vs. Jay
BUT

If you listen to Pro Bodybuilding weekly radio show with BOB CHICK and DAN when they had Jay on - he said that Ronnie in 2003 was the best physique in bodybuilding! From the horses mouth! Granted everyone has their personal favorite physiques - but Ronnie wins this one !

Amen brother!
 

Spike

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
1,000
Points
0
i voted for jay because i like his physique A LOT MORE than i do colemans but i know ronnie 03 would beat him
 

alex

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
920
Points
0
ronnie 2003 all the way.i have the video of 2003 ronnie prejudging and its the most insane thing ever to walk on earth.cutler may deserved this olympia (i am not sure)but he is nowhere near ronnie at his all time best.keep it real team cutler dont get over excited
 

Line

Chaos reigns.
VIP
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,852
Points
0
Flex, you should have made the poll so that we could see who actually voted for Cutler...and not let them have opinions from now on.
 

MexicanMuscle

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
965
Points
0
even though i don't like Ronnie's physique, well i don't even like Cutler's for that matter, but i have to say Ronnie has him beat, much more dry and grainy, and good size with a controlled waist.
 

mvsf1

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
6,499
Points
0
You won't belive me, I HAD the opinion that Ron 2003 was better, but when I looked at this pics I must say.... Jay looks better!!!

I wouldn't belive my words back in 2003... but it's true.

Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation... I also believe his back is ahead of Ron's... unbelivable, but today is true...

And I'm basing my opinion the most in I think Jay's phisique is more pleasing that Coleman's...

My choice: Jay Cutler.
 

Line

Chaos reigns.
VIP
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,852
Points
0
mvsf1 said:
You won't belive me, I HAD the opinion that Ron 2003 was better, but when I looked at this pics I must say.... Jay looks better!!!
Like I said, watch the videos from 2003 Prejudging...this is not a difficult choice people.
Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation...I also believe his back is ahead of Ron's... unbelivable, but today is true...
:uhoh2:
 

Pain

............
VIP
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Messages
14,026
Points
0
Not even close,No1 can match Ronnie 2003 for size and conditioning.
 

Tunen

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
2,327
Points
0
mvsf1 said:
Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation...
That's just silly man...

Nothing has ever been close to Ronnie 2003 :yarly:
 

TrueOutlaw

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
554
Points
0
this thread is so not necssary Big Ron no question anybody that disagrees is obvioulsy ignorant
 

BigBen

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
5,141
Points
38
mvsf1 said:
You won't belive me, I HAD the opinion that Ron 2003 was better, but when I looked at this pics I must say.... Jay looks better!!!

I wouldn't belive my words back in 2003... but it's true.

Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation... I also believe his back is ahead of Ron's... unbelivable, but today is true...

And I'm basing my opinion the most in I think Jay's phisique is more pleasing that Coleman's...

My choice: Jay Cutler.


Your nuts, no way does jays back have more detail than rons. U have a biased view
 

patdiddy

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 20, 2006
Messages
1,135
Points
0
Damn i dont know.... I like Ron in some shots and Jay in others....... I think the judges would prefer Big Ron.
 
Top