Ronnie 2003 vs Jay 2006

[Flex]

I noticed someone mentioned Jay Cutler was the best combined package of size and conditioning this year. I'm sure many Ronnie Coleman fans would argue with that, especially because of Ronnie Coleman's 2003 appearance. Which do you think is the better package?

Ronnie Coleman

 

[BigBen]

I biased, but u know i like ronnie coleman, so coleman has the better package, his physique looks better to me, jay cutler has more detail in the legs, thats it. Ronnies physique is more pleasing to me, jay looks blocky, and rons lines flow better.

But everyone is gonna have their own argument

 

[Paulie]

Im going to go ahead and say Jay Cutler in '06 just because I prefer jays physique over big rons. They both look amazing.

Bigben - I dont really think Jay Cutler is blocky. Ruhl is one of the most blocky physiques, and thats the only one that really stands out the most.

 

[Line]

I'm sorry but this isn't even close. The 2003 version of Ronnie probably the best combination of size, condition, and shape we've ever seen. Jay in 2006 looked great and it was a personal best for him but the '03 Ron is arguably the best we've seen from anyone.

Just watch his prejudging video from 2003...pictures don't do him justice.

 

[fistacuffs]

Im fairly neutral when it comes to Ronnie vs. Jay
BUT

If you listen to Pro Bodybuilding weekly radio show with BOB CHICK and DAN when they had Jay on - he said that Ronnie in 2003 was the best physique in bodybuilding! From the horses mouth! Granted everyone has their personal favorite physiques - but Ronnie wins this one !

 

[sexnews]

Im fairly neutral when it comes to Ronnie vs. Jay
BUT

If you listen to Pro Bodybuilding weekly radio show with BOB CHICK and DAN when they had Jay on - he said that Ronnie in 2003 was the best physique in bodybuilding! From the horses mouth! Granted everyone has their personal favorite physiques - but Ronnie wins this one !

Amen brother!

 

[fistacuffs]

Amen brother!

GAME OVER..LIGHTS OUT!! haha

yea i watched Cost of Redemption! lol

 

[Spike]

i voted for jay because i like his physique A LOT MORE than i do colemans but i know ronnie 03 would beat him

 

[alex]

ronnie 2003 all the way.i have the video of 2003 ronnie prejudging and its the most insane thing ever to walk on earth.cutler may deserved this olympia (i am not sure)but he is nowhere near ronnie at his all time best.keep it real team cutler dont get over excited

 

[Line]

Flex, you should have made the poll so that we could see who actually voted for Cutler...and not let them have opinions from now on.

 

[MexicanMuscle]

even though i don't like Ronnie's physique, well i don't even like Cutler's for that matter, but i have to say Ronnie has him beat, much more dry and grainy, and good size with a controlled waist.

 

[mvsf1]

You won't belive me, I HAD the opinion that Ron 2003 was better, but when I looked at this pics I must say.... Jay looks better!!!

I wouldn't belive my words back in 2003... but it's true.

Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation... I also believe his back is ahead of Ron's... unbelivable, but today is true...

And I'm basing my opinion the most in I think Jay's phisique is more pleasing that Coleman's...

My choice: Jay Cutler.

 

[Line]

You won't belive me, I HAD the opinion that Ron 2003 was better, but when I looked at this pics I must say.... Jay looks better!!!

Like I said, watch the videos from 2003 Prejudging...this is not a difficult choice people.

Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation...I also believe his back is ahead of Ron's... unbelivable, but today is true...

 

[Maxmonzter]

Ronnie owns alll 2003 jay isn´t even close

 

[Spike]

2003 jay isn´t even close

this is about 2006 jay not 2003 jay

 

[Pain]

Not even close,No1 can match Ronnie 2003 for size and conditioning.

 

[Tunen]

Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation...

That's just silly man...

Nothing has ever been close to Ronnie 2003

 

[TrueOutlaw]

this thread is so not necssary Big Ron no question anybody that disagrees is obvioulsy ignorant

 

[BigBen]

You won't belive me, I HAD the opinion that Ron 2003 was better, but when I looked at this pics I must say.... Jay looks better!!!

I wouldn't belive my words back in 2003... but it's true.

Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation... I also believe his back is ahead of Ron's... unbelivable, but today is true...

And I'm basing my opinion the most in I think Jay's phisique is more pleasing that Coleman's...

My choice: Jay Cutler.

Your nuts, no way does jays back have more detail than rons. U have a biased view

 

[patdiddy]

Damn i dont know.... I like Ron in some shots and Jay in others....... I think the judges would prefer Big Ron.