Ronnie 2003 vs Jay 2006

[Deathmaggot]

ronnie at his best is unstoppable


btw, are those stats true?


Ronnie Coleman '03 (5'11", 287 lbs.) // i think coleman was 300?
Jay Cutler '06 (5'9", roughly 280 lbs.) // i think jay was 270

 

[Daniel Andersson]

ronnie at his best is unstoppable


btw, are those stats true?


Ronnie Coleman '03 (5'11", 287 lbs.) // i think coleman was 300?
Jay Cutler '06 (5'9", roughly 280 lbs.) // i think jay was 270

Ronnie was 287lbs at Mr.O 03
Jay was 274lbs at Mr.O 06

 

[Duality]

lol at this being a poll. i mean really?

even cutler fans know this isnt even close.

 

[mvsf1]

Ronnie.

 

[Deathmaggot]

lol at this being a poll. i mean really?

even cutler fans know this isnt even close.

rly? look at the pools

 

[Pioneer]

I don't think its even close Ronnie > Cutler any year expect 07 (ofcourse) and maybe 06.

 

[Savjav]

You won't belive me, I HAD the opinion that Ron 2003 was better, but when I looked at this pics I must say.... Jay looks better!!!

I wouldn't belive my words back in 2003... but it's true.

Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation... I also believe his back is ahead of Ron's... unbelivable, but today is true...

And I'm basing my opinion the most in I think Jay's phisique is more pleasing that Coleman's...

My choice: Jay Cutler.

speechless at how stupid this is..

 

[Ironslave]

You won't belive me, I HAD the opinion that Ron 2003 was better, but when I looked at this pics I must say.... Jay looks better!!!

I wouldn't belive my words back in 2003... but it's true.

Jay destroys Ron in hams detail, quads separation... I also believe his back is ahead of Ron's... unbelivable, but today is true...

And I'm basing my opinion the most in I think Jay's phisique is more pleasing that Coleman's...

My choice: Jay Cutler.

Cut to a year and a half later....

Ronnie.

mvsf1 has gotten his eyes fixed recently.

 

[Pain]

Cut to a year and a half later....




mvsf1 has gotten his eyes fixed recently.

 

[FlexFan]

Just watch his prejudging video from 2003...pictures don't do him justice.

Where's that video?

 

[Rageking]

Cut to a year and a half later....
mvsf1 has gotten his eyes fixed recently.

i was reading this thread through and was going to post that also

 

[TTTT]

Ronnie looks much better.

 

[isopure]

In my opinion I think Ronnie is much better than Jay. This package is amazing but I think Ronnie was better in 2001 in Arnold Classic. That year was the most incredible phisique I´ve ever seen in my life.

 

[The Creator]

They both look amazing in these pics but this one goes to Ronnie Coleman no doubt. The only poses I think could be compared maybe are abs/thigh and side tricep.

 

[nikrei89]

IMO Ronnie takes that abs and thigh pose too. I just cant understand why people hate Ronnie in that pose. Cutler has got ugly abs and when he does that pose, he just looks stupid. Ronnie flows much better.

 

[WillTheThrill]

cutler has him beat inleg definition but thats it, everything else is big ron

 

[BigBen]

i j looked at these pics again and hands down it is coleman, his skin i paper thin. He actually beat jay in the side tricep pose. ronnie has striations in his tricep jay does not.

 

[Big04pimpin]

I personally don't think thats Jay's best. And 03 ronnie kills him.

 

[German_Joe]

I went with big Ron. he looks harder, dryer and more vascular then Jay.

 

[Skeptic]

i went with cutler... and no i shan't explain myself because no one will agree with why i chose cutler.