What Happened to the Golden Era Female Bodybuilding Aesthetics?

[keeptough22]

​

The Golden Era of female bodybuilding, which lasted from the 1970s to the 1990s, marked a defining period in the sport’s history. During this time, female bodybuilders celebrated muscular development alongside grace, balance, and femininity. Women’s bodybuilding flourished, and athletes with symmetrical, well-conditioned physiques gained recognition on major competitive stages.

However, as the sport evolved, the standards for female bodybuilding began shifting away from its classic aesthetics toward an emphasis on extreme muscularity. This transformation led to significant changes in how the sport was perceived and structured.

The Golden Era Aesthetic Defined​

The Golden Era of female bodybuilding stressed proportion and balance—the perfect combination of muscle and femininity. The competitors had defined bodies with muscle tone without excess bulk. The score was largely dependent on symmetry and presentation, where points focused on the importance of an overall harmonious look rather than size.

Key figures of this era included Rachel McLish, the first Ms. Olympia and a symbol of feminine muscularity. Cory Everson, a six-time Ms. Olympia, embodied strength and grace, while Lenda Murray introduced a slightly more muscular yet still aesthetically balanced physique.

These women set the standards for female bodybuilding, where judges prioritized symmetry, conditioning, and stage presence over mass alone.

The Shift in Bodybuilding Standards​

As the 2000s approached, female bodybuilding standards began to resemble men's division standards. Extreme muscularity and conditioning have replaced proportion and femininity. Competitors began seeking increased muscle size, definition, and lower body fat percentages.

The judging criteria also changed, rewarding competitors with more muscle mass and with more striated physiques. This shift discouraged many athletes who chose the earlier, more balanced look.

The Role of Fitness and Bikini Divisions​

Bodybuilding competitions introduced Fitness, Figure, and, later, Bikini divisions for women who did not want to become extremely muscular. These new categories emphasized athleticism, symmetry, and marketable appeal and gradually diverted attention from traditional female bodybuilding.

Fitness competitors displayed strength, agility, and muscle tone, whereas Figure competitors displayed lean, sculpted shapes with defined but not overly muscular bodies. The bikini division further promoted a soft, commercially appealing aesthetic.

As these categories grew in popularity, mainstream media and sponsors shifted their focus, making it more challenging for classic female bodybuilding to maintain relevance.

The Decline of Classic Female Bodybuilding​

With the rise of new divisions, traditional female bodybuilding began experiencing a decline in sponsorships and media coverage. Many companies that once supported classic bodybuilding redirected their investments toward Fitness, Figure, and Bikini athletes, citing their broader appeal to general audiences.

Competition opportunities for traditional female bodybuilders became scarce as major organizations, including the IFBB, adapted their approach to women's divisions. The Ms. Olympia competition, once the pinnacle of female bodybuilding, was discontinued for several years, reflecting the sport’s diminishing presence at the highest level.

The Impact of Social Media and Modern Trends​

On Instagram, fitness influencers and models have become mainstream. These influencers promoted lean, toned physiques that reflected Fitness and Bikini standards rather than extreme muscularity.

A shift in public preference toward aesthetically pleasing yet attainable physiques over the demands of competitive bodybuilding was partly due to the online fitness culture.

In recent years, however, natural bodybuilding has been resurgent, and some Golden Era aesthetics have returned. Organizations focused on drug-tested competitions advertise balanced, proportionate bodies as an alternative for women seeking a return to classic sports ideals.

Frequently Asked Questions​

Why did female bodybuilding move away from the Golden Era aesthetic?

Changes in judging criteria, increased emphasis on extreme muscularity, and the influence of men’s bodybuilding standards shifted this change. The introduction of the Fitness, Figure, and Bikini divisions also contributed by providing more commercially viable alternatives.

Who were the most influential female bodybuilders of the Golden Era?

Notable figures include Rachel McLish, Cory Everson, and Lenda Murray. These athletes embodied the era’s aesthetics of balance, proportion, and femininity while setting the foundation for female bodybuilding.

Why did mainstream sponsors stop supporting traditional female bodybuilding?

Due to their broader appeal, sponsors shifted their focus to divisions like Fitness and Bikini. The extreme muscularity of modern female bodybuilding made it less marketable to general audiences and fitness brands.