Skeptic
I am god.
VIP
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2007
- Messages
- 7,450
- Points
- 38
they actually have to, the risk to get injured is way higher than with shoes.
Yeah I know, I don't mind training in my chuckies, I just prefer bare feet.
they actually have to, the risk to get injured is way higher than with shoes.
they actually have to, the risk to get injured is way higher than with shoes.
Timberland Pro titan series high top etc
something like this one, same stuff, but mine looks slightly different
http://www.timberland.com/product/i...&cp=1762199.1780842.2453766&parentPage=family
* 360 degrees of lightweight comfort
* Polyurethane midsole provides lightweight, durable cushioning
* Soft leathers to minimise break-in time
* Moisture-channeling spacer mesh comfort lining with integral anti-microbial keeps foot dry and comfortable
* Nylon diffusion shank for torsional rigidity
* Stretch elastic on each side for flexible, slip-on convenience
* Timberland PRO® rubber outsole is slip-, oil- and abrasion-resistant and has exceptional cushioning
* Contoured OrthoLite® footbed with Outlast® Adaptive Comfort® cover to regulate temperature
* Non-metallic TiTan® safety toe for lightweight protection and roomy fit
* Non-metallic hardware
* Looks really hardcore when worn in the gym
Basically all those fancy measures they do on feet to select a shoe for your arch type are BS. This doesn't take into account plantar flexion levels and level of heel strike though so a well trained shoe salesman should be able to spot what will suit the best from gait analysis.Injury Reduction Effectiveness of Selecting Running Shoes Based on Plantar Shape.
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 23(3):685-697, May 2009.
Knapik, Joseph J 1; Swedler, David I 1; Grier, Tyson L 1; Hauret, Keith G 1; Bullock, Steven H 1; Williams, Kelly W 2; Darakjy, Salima S 1; Lester, Mark E 3; Tobler, Steven K 4; Jones, Bruce H 1
Abstract:
Knapik, JJ, Swedler, DI, Grier, TL, Hauret, KG, Bullock, SH, Williams, KW, Darakjy, SS, Lester, ME, Tobler, SK, and Jones, BH. Injury reduction effectiveness of selecting running shoes based on plantar shape. J Strength Cond Res 23(3): 685-697, 2009-Popular running magazines and running shoe companies suggest that imprints of the bottom of the feet (plantar shape) can be used as an indication of the height of the medial longitudinal foot arch and that this can be used to select individually appropriate types of running shoes. This study examined whether or not this selection technique influenced injury risk during United States Army Basic Combat Training (BCT). After foot examinations, BCT recruits in an experimental group (E: n = 1,079 men and 451 women) selected motion control, stability, or cushioned shoes for plantar shapes judged to represent low, medium, or high foot arches, respectively. A control group (C: n = 1,068 men and 464 women) received a stability shoe regardless of plantar shape. Injuries during BCT were determined from outpatient medical records. Other previously known injury risk factors (e.g., age, fitness, and smoking) were obtained from a questionnaire and existing databases. Multivariate Cox regression controlling for other injury risk factors showed little difference in injury risk between the E and C groups among men (risk ratio (E/C) = 1.01; 95% confidence interval = 0.88-1.16; p = 0.87) or women (risk ratio (E/C) = 1.07; 95% confidence interval = 0.91-1.25; p = 0.44). In practical application, this prospective study demonstrated that selecting shoes based on plantar shape had little influence on injury risk in BCT. Thus, if the goal is injury prevention, this selection technique is not necessary in BCT.
Possibly the worst shoes ever worn in a gym.
but the best looking shoe
i wear shox too. for squats i take them off sometimes. weight feels lighter for some reason if you have some cushion..