M
mvsf1
Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 6,429
- Points
- 38
That's because he is closer to the camera
Freeman's back lat spread is bloody huge. Branch doesn't have great lats (he's all teres major).
Of course he's closer to the cam but you got my point. He looks thicker than Freeman (and the rest of guys in that comparision shot) because he has a lot of muscle in that mini-frame of his.
That's why the guys amazes me (of course his arms and back thickness/simmetry are lagging).