David Henry Vs Kevin English {NY Pro 2008}

[Daniel Andersson]

There was no front dubble biceps on David

 

[Tunen]

Lighting is terrible. Henry takes it.

 

[Daniel Andersson]

I might take the light down on the next pics

 

[PrinceVegeta]

henry...but the other guy looks good 2

 

[Lionheart]

I think its close ,but ill chose Henry.Besides i dont like the cap between Kevins abs..

 

[Zigurd]

Daaaavid all the way.

 

[lifterdead]

How the fuck did English place ahead of Dave????????????????

 

[Braaq]

How the fuck did English place ahead of Dave????????????????

I see it, English had a smaller waist, better arms and legs, more vascular, great back and not as short with wider shoulders. Not to mention he looks in superior condition.

 

[Paulie]

Max was the only one to get this right...

 

[lifterdead]

I see it, English had a smaller waist, better arms and legs, more vascular, great back and not as short with wider shoulders. Not to mention he looks in superior condition.

I took another, closer look at the pics, and I agree with you on a few things. English has, overall, just better structure. (Shoulder waist ratio, muscle bellies, etc.) And, I must admit, he looks to be in slightly better conditioning....



However, I think Dave's back is vastly superior, although he seems not to be hitting the rear double bi right, although English's structure gives him a more dramatic taper.
But smaller waist? It looks like the opposite to me. English seems to have problems with his stomach, and I think others have commented as much.


As I see it, Dave beats English in the mass dept., hands down. I still would go with Dave's arms over English's, and the legs are a toss up. Hmm.... Guess I'll have to go take a look at the vid.


Good battle of short men.

 

[Duality]

I see it, English had a smaller waist, better arms and legs, more vascular, great back and not as short with wider shoulders. Not to mention he looks in superior condition.

not to mention dave's legs in the side shots SUCK!!! henry's back and arms are better though.

i go with henry here. there both about the same size and comparably conditioned, but henry is more aesthitcally pleasing.

 

[Lisu]

Kevin wins only due to better conditioning because for me both look same good.

Kevin's better vascularity, especially legs

 

[Minchinator]

I can't stand Kevin's outer quads, you can't see the muscle, just viens, especially the left one, it just looks odd.

 

[Beau]

I see it, English had a smaller waist, better arms and legs, more vascular, great back and not as short with wider shoulders. Not to mention he looks in superior condition.

I agree

 

[anaboliod]

henry's legs hurt him alot in this comp. his side leg poses are weak as well as his lack of definition in the hams and glutes...this has alot to do with lights but at this caliber of BB you have to be DIALED!

 

[Flex]

I'm not a fan of Kevin's physique, but he definetly beat David Henry fair & square.

 

[lifterdead]

henry's legs hurt him alot in this comp.

I definately noticed that. Seems to be the same problem J.O.J. has with his upper body overpowering his lower.

Genetics?

 

[Rageking]

english
dominated the side shots

 

[wallyprice]

Davids physique is a lot more pleasing to the eye. Crazy definition minus the veiny look that Kevin sports

 

[Flex]

Henry only wins in most muscular and abs/thigh. Front relaxed and lat spread are close.