Ronnie Coleman Vs Kevin Levrone(Olympia 2002)

[nigster]

Good comparison. But, this is not the best Kevin IMO.

 

[Lionheart]

Agree w nigster.2002 was not the best Kevin.Kevin was better 94,95,97(GP tour) and 00 at least.Ronnie takes it with better legs and back.

 

[nigster]

Agree w nigster.2002 was not the best Kevin.Kevin was better 94,95,97(GP tour) and 00 at least.Ronnie takes it with better legs and back.

Yes, Kevin had some kind of injury earlier that year and he couldn't train his legs properly. He wasn't that ripped either. Still in great shape and it was a close call but not that close. :methman:

 

[Johnny Bravo]

Yes, Kevin had some kind of injury earlier that year and he couldn't train his legs properly. He wasn't that ripped either. Still in great shape and it was a close call but not that close. :methman:

Actually Kevin injured his lower back in the mid 90's (if I'm not mistaken) and as a result of that coudn't do heavy squats.

 

[Duality]

if there is one Mr O ronnie very well could have lost justifiably, it was this one. kevin looks great, i would still give it to ronnie though. his legs really dwarf levrone.

 

[Zviko]

Ronnie beats in all the poses except for side tricep but ronnie looked awsome though