The Best Back in History

[Deathmaggot]

/thread hijacking FAILLURE , and hijackers got :gnd: :gnd: :gnd:

not his back but, shocked me anyways

i also know this is a repost from BBD era but still cool

http://www.thebiguniverse.com/coleman/transform.html

look at that beast

 

[Line]

What the fuck is Cutler doing in this thread?

He HAD impressive density... great big ron coleman.

Do you know the definition of density in relation to bodybuilding? No need to answer, I will for you: no.

 

[Pain]

Cutler's back is at his best ever, but i wouldnt say it's up there with Ronnie's(prime) or Dorians.

 

[Pain]

Dorian and Nasser.

 

[Light weight]

 

[Paulie]

What the fuck is Cutler doing in this thread?

LOL I had to. I just wanted to give Cutler a slight bit of recognition.

 

[cem]

damn!! samir had a great back, thnx for those pics sexnews

 

[MexicanMuscle]

well between Dorian and Ronnie, i say Dorian's back is better, but i we can't forget Stubbs.

 

[Line]

LOL I had to. I just wanted to give Cutler a slight bit of recognition.

LOL, I know, but now I have to pick on you, Paulie


Based on pure size? Sure, but his shape isn't anything great, even if it is technically "symmetrical". Dex, Victor, and David all have better-shaped and conditioned backs than Cutler easily.

 

[fahad]

did someone forgot about orville burke...

 

[Tonka]

ye i did.

 

[mvsf1]

Do you know the definition of density in relation to bodybuilding? No need to answer, I will for you: no.

Hey, hey, hey, don't talk me like that, daddy.

I know what I'm saying and that's why I said it. Ronnie LOST a lot of density. You should be blind if u say that he has the same density he had in 2003... check "sexnews" avatar and open your eyes.... welcome to 2007, brother.

 

[Deathmaggot]

cant find any back shot now but look at this

impressive

 

[mvsf1]

cant find any back shot now but look at this

impressive

Sure... how's him???

 

[Line]

Hey, hey, hey, don't talk me like that, daddy.

I know what I'm saying and that's why I said it. Ronnie LOST a lot of density. You should be blind if u say that he has the same density he had in 2003... check "sexnews" avatar and open your eyes.... welcome to 2007, brother.

 

[mvsf1]

GOOD back, Line, but man, nothing to do with his good old days:

Is he as great as he was??? No, he is not. Game over.

 

[Bulkboy]

I agree. Jay has a lot better back then ronnie atm...

 

[rayrod]

ain't nuthin but a peanut

 

[Line]

GOOD back, Line, but man, nothing to do with his good old days...

Is he as great as he was??? No, he is not. Game over.

You argued density, not the overall quality of his back which was never in dispute.

 

[Tunen]

I agree. Jay has a lot better back then ronnie atm...

You can't be serious