KaiGold
Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2014
- Messages
- 4,464
- Points
- 108
That's incredible.
I am using the MuscleMecca Bodybuilding Mobile App!
Legal Notice – MuscleMecca Forums
MuscleMecca.com is an educational discussion platform. We do not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or performance-enhancing substances.
All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing posted on this forum should be considered medical or legal advice.
Do not attempt to sell, source, or promote illegal substances. Any such activity will result in an immediate and permanent ban and may be reported to the proper authorities.
By using this site, you agree to comply with all forum rules, disclaimers, and applicable laws in your jurisdiction.
That's incredible.
Two guys from back in the day when had the best biceps IMO were Larry Scott and Boyer Coe.Larry Scott and Freddy Ortiz 60's
![]()
THANKS BROTHER!!!@The King Of Lurkers you great video posts!
Hey Iceman, sry if I post this here, but I remember various times when some were saying Cutler in 2009 is his best version ever etc.
I think we may have agreed on the 2001 version of him. and this video is a cool quick comparison.
Both in the same lighting and on the same stage, I would still go to Jay 2001.
I do think that in 2009 he had a few more impressive poses and details, but some might be because of the great stage lighting.
Hey Iceman, sry if I post this here, but I remember various times when some were saying Cutler in 2009 is his best version ever etc.
I think we may have agreed on the 2001 version of him. and this video is a cool quick comparison.
Both in the same lighting and on the same stage, I would still go to Jay 2001.
I do think that in 2009 he had a few more impressive poses and details, but some might be because of the great stage lighting.
I agree with you about 2001 being better than 2009.
In 2001, he had better symmetry, proportions, shape, smaller waist. In 2009, his conditioning may have been slightly better and his back, bust his waist was wider and he was "Top heavy".
Exactly, top heavy as you said. And one thing that I have noticed as well are the delts that do not have the same 3D pop like in 2001. You can see it easily in the front lat spread pose.I agree with you about 2001 being better than 2009.
In 2001, he had better symmetry, proportions, shape, smaller waist. In 2009, his conditioning may have been slightly better and his back, bust his waist was wider and he was "Top heavy".
I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and acknowledge the following:
MuscleMecca.com does not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or pharmaceutical products.
Advertisers are fully responsible for their content. Use this section at your own risk.
All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as medical, legal, or purchasing advice.
Illegal activity is strictly prohibited and may result in permanent bans.