skid9832004
Well-known member
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 337
- Points
- 16
u g2 be fkin kidding me the last question was bullshit wtf the end the debate on a hahahaha punch wtf ? like its a joke...
CNN is screwing with the numbers. I've checked the results a couple times and each time it seems like have reset the votes.From the link Tech posted
Results as they stand so far:
1. Paul 64%
2. Paul 63%
3. Paul 58%
4. Giuliani 29% <---- haha
5. Paul 42%
6. Paul 56%
7. Paul 57%
Pretty good for 2 minutes of speaking, wouldn't you say?
MediaRat said:Mr. Paul, I think we both know that the Republican party is never going to give you the nomination. But I'm hoping that you're crazy like a fox like that and you're using this exposure to propel yourself into an independent run.
My question is for Ron Paul: Mr. Paul, are you going to let America down by not running as an independent?
These Republicans using World War 2 as an example of the Iraq war is preposterous. I loved the way Ron shook his head at McCain after he said that bullshit, but he wasn't given nearly enough time to reply. This entire debate he was shafted, anybody else notice that of all the Youtube questions for Ron Paul (I have no doubt in my mind that Ron Paul was the reason the Republicans received thousands more questions than the Democrats) they picked one's that included...
1.) Majority of your supporters are consiracy theorists
2.) You have no chance in hell at getting the Republican nomination
I'll have to check it out again sometime but the question used for Thompson and Ron Paul (I think it was on cutting spending), it seemed like Anderson gave Thompson eighteen times more time to speak on the topic. Within seconds, he was interrupting Paul. Maybe Thompson is just so dull and boring that it appeared longer than it was. Anyways, the Fox News debates were better than this one; as sad as that sounds.