• Legal Notice – MuscleMecca Forums

    MuscleMecca.com is an educational discussion platform. We do not sell, promote, or endorse any bodybuilding gear, supplements, research chemicals, or performance-enhancing substances.

    All discussions are for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing posted on this forum should be considered medical or legal advice.

    Do not attempt to sell, source, or promote illegal substances. Any such activity will result in an immediate and permanent ban and may be reported to the proper authorities.

    By using this site, you agree to comply with all forum rules, disclaimers, and applicable laws in your jurisdiction.

    Read Our Full Disclaimer and Forum Rules

  • Follow the 2026 Olympia on September 24 to 27, 2026!

Official Film Discussion and Last Movie You Watched

Skeptic

Skeptic

I am god.
VIP
Joined
Dec 23, 2007
Messages
7,444
Points
38
Hehe, yeah thats all I got out of it. My rating was just in fun anyway.
 
tim290280

tim290280

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
7,956
Points
73
Star Trek

The new one, watched on our new blueray player. Probably better the second time seeing it with our own unit in HD. Sound wasn't as overpowering as it was in the cinema and the action was better on the TV rather than the screen.

One of the few Star Trek films that wasn't boring (although I need to rewatch The Wrath of Khan). I also made the comment halfway through that they had more character development in half a film than the entire series has had thus far. Thoughts?
 
Line

Line

Chaos reigns.
VIP
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
6,255
Points
38
I also made the comment halfway through that they had more character development in half a film than the entire series has had thus far. Thoughts?
It's hard to say, as I'm not a follower of Star Trek in any way shape or form and, though I applaud Abram's efforts on taking the franchise in a more consciously-minded direction, I found what the film had to say about both friendship and fate to be pretty vacuous and generic. Then there's the plot holes more gaping than Taylor Rain's asshole...
 
tim290280

tim290280

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
7,956
Points
73
It's hard to say, as I'm not a follower of Star Trek in any way shape or form and, though I applaud Abram's efforts on taking the franchise in a more consciously-minded direction, I found what the film had to say about both friendship and fate to be pretty vacuous and generic. Then there's the plot holes more gaping than Taylor Rain's asshole...

Yeh. How does a mining ship manage to go from peaceful to warbird in a matter of minutes/hours? How does at least a day transpire or travel at warp mean that the Enterprise is still in the same system, yet it only takes a few more hours to travel to Earth..........

But then again I was never expecting, nor should we expect, profound moments in a Star Trek film. When viewed as a whole film it was good entertainment, despite its flaws. I also thought as a "blockbuster" it was one of the few to hit its mark in the big films of late (the other being Bond).

Oh and interesting fact: Taylor Rain started having anal sex before she had regular sex :borat:
 
tim290280

tim290280

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
7,956
Points
73
Batman 3 Probably Won't Be In 3D
By Eric Eisenberg: 2010-04-21 11:56:24

Batman 3 Probably Won't Be In 3D If you haven't already heard about it, there is an experiment currently happening in the film industry. Called "3D," filmmakers have begun using digital cameras that allows actors and actresses on screen to reach out and pickpocket the audience. Since James Cameron's Avatar, directors such as Bryan Singer, Guillermo Del Toro and Peter Jackson have all come out in support of the technology. But what about directors who recognize 3D as a fad? Enter Christopher Nolan.

Both Cinematical and AICN recently gathered quotes from The Dark Knight and regular Nolan cinematographer Wally Pfister about the possibility of the third Batman movie will be filmed in 3D. The short answer? Don't expect Batman's cape to be whipping you in the face anytime soon. When asked about the new technology if reference to the caped crusader, Pfister responded that both he and Nolan are "'devotees' of film" with a shared disinterest in the new dimension. He then went on to call 3D a distraction that's "great for like amusement park rides like the 'Honey I Shrunk The Kids' ride at Disneyland," and said that the "fad might pass by the time that summer comes around."

Harsh (but true) words from a great director of photography. The interview also suggests that he would be open to shooting the entire film in IMAX, but he also seemed fairly non-committal to the idea. There always remains the possibility that Warner Bros. will try and pressure the director into using 3D, but considering the second Batman film made $533 million without the additional cost of glasses and the fact that Nolan has essentially been put in charge of the DC Comics wing, it doesn't seem very likely.




I'm glad someone out there in movie land isn't going to compromise film-making for "cheap" thrills.
 
Line

Line

Chaos reigns.
VIP
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
6,255
Points
38
Wally Pfister is still overrated.
 

MuscleMecca Crew

Mecca Staff
tim290280

tim290280

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
7,956
Points
73
Ninja Assassins

Cheesy, cliche, consternated, but it had ninjas in it so it absolutely rocked!!!!!!!

It was also good to see Ben Miles from Coupling in it.
 
Anabolicus

Anabolicus

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
1,244
Points
38
Kick-Ass

Everything was ok until the girl with extreme martial arts came and kicked asses of 10 guys while dodging every single bullet. The movie started out as it should have been. A guy with no powers trying to help others yet it still ended with the very same guy flying around with a jetpack and using dual-miniguns while floating in air and owning dozen of bad guys. Defendor was heaps better.

Ofcourse I can't forget mentioning Nicholas Cage's ''exellent'' voice acting.

AAAAHHH THE BEEEEES NOT THE BEEEEES
 
Tech

Tech

Ron Paul FTW
VIP
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
4,789
Points
63
Call me crazy, but I thought Kick-Ass was stupid.

Then again, I didn't watch the whole movie.
 
Anabolicus

Anabolicus

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
1,244
Points
38
Call me crazy, but I thought Kick-Ass was stupid.

Then again, I didn't watch the whole movie.

You're right, it was stupid.


Shutter Island

Liked it.
 
Anabolicus

Anabolicus

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
1,244
Points
38
Taken

It's so funny how always the last bad guy remaining can present the most resistance to the main character, resulting in a 5 minute fight scene.

After seeing this film I know now that Liam Neeson can beat Chuck Norris.

Good movie though. 8/10
 
tim290280

tim290280

Mecca V.I.P.
VIP
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
7,956
Points
73
^^ You don't get to be the boss by being a pussy. Plus the hero is usually a bit worn out by then too.


Beowulf


I almost want to say it was rubbish. But I made it all the way through, so it can't have sucked enough to make me give up on it. I can't think of a single redeeming feature of the film, other than it was better than watching a bunch of crap prime time sitcoms on TV (but that is like saying I'd like my left arm cut off instead of having my right cut off).
 
Top